Cost-effectiveness of end-game strategies against sleeping sickness across the Democratic Republic of Congo

Marina Antillon,Ching-I Huang,Samuel A. Sutherland,Ronald E. Crump,Paul E. Brown,Paul R. Bessell,Emily H. Crowley,Rian Snijders,Andrew Hope,Iñaki Tirados,Sophie Dunkley,Paul Verlé,Junior Lebuki,Chansy Shampa,Erick Mwamba Miaka,Fabrizio Tediosi,Kat S. Rock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.29.24305066
2024-03-30
Abstract:Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) is marked for elimination of transmission (EoT) by 2030. We examined the cost-effectiveness (CE) of EoT in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which has the highest global gHAT burden. In 166 health zones (HZs), we modelled the transmission dynamics, health outcomes, and economic costs of six strategies during 2024-40, including the cessation of activities after case reporting reduces to zero. Uncertainty in CE was assessed within the net monetary framework, presented as the optimal strategies at a range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) values, denominated in costs per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Status quo strategies, CE strategies (WTP=$500), and strategies with a high probability of EoT by 2030 are predicted to yield EoT by 2030 in 117 HZs, 130 HZs, and 138 HZs respectively, at a cost by 2040 of $159M (82M–266M), $175M ($98M–$285M), $206M ($114M–$339M). A more lenient timeline of EoT by 2040 could lead to EoT in 153 HZs at a cost of $189M ($105M–$311M), leaving 13 HZs shy of the goal. Investing in EoT by 2030 is predicted to reduce gHAT deaths from 34,770 (14,113–71,118) with status quo strategies to 8,214 (3,284–18,507).
Health Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the issue of eliminating the transmission of Gambian human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT, also known as sleeping sickness) within the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Specifically, the study explores how to economically achieve the elimination of gHAT transmission by evaluating the cost-effectiveness of six different strategies from 2024 to 2040. These strategies include different combinations of passive screening (PS), active screening (AS), treatment, and vector control (VC) using Tiny Targets. The study particularly focuses on the transmission dynamics, health outcomes, and economic costs in 166 health zones and assesses the optimal strategies under different willingness-to-pay (WTP) values. The main objectives of the paper include: 1. **Feasibility Assessment**: Determine whether it is possible to achieve the elimination of gHAT transmission by 2030 under the current tools and technological conditions. 2. **Cost-Effectiveness Analysis**: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different strategies through model simulations to identify the most economically efficient strategy at different levels of willingness to pay. 3. **Strategy Optimization**: Propose specific strategy adjustments to increase the probability of achieving EoT, especially in health zones where current strategies are insufficient to meet the target. Through these analyses, the study aims to provide scientific evidence to policymakers, guiding them on how to allocate resources more effectively under limited resources to achieve the goal of eliminating gHAT transmission.