Abstract:Using forests to mitigate climate change has gained much interest in science and policy discussions. We examine the evidence for carbon benefits, environmental and monetary costs, risks and trade-offs for a variety of activities in three general strategies: (1) land use change to increase forest area (afforestation) and avoid deforestation; (2) carbon management in existing forests; and (3) the use of wood as biomass energy, in place of other building materials, or in wood products for carbon storage. We found that many strategies can increase forest sector carbon mitigation above the current 162-256 Tg C/yr, and that many strategies have co-benefits such as biodiversity, water, and economic opportunities. Each strategy also has trade-offs, risks, and uncertainties including possible leakage, permanence, disturbances, and climate change effects. Because approximately 60% of the carbon lost through deforestation and harvesting from 1700 to 1935 has not yet been recovered and because some strategies store carbon in forest products or use biomass energy, the biological potential for forest sector carbon mitigation is large. Several studies suggest that using these strategies could offset as much as 10-20% of current U.S. fossil fuel emissions. To obtain such large offsets in the United States would require a combination of afforesting up to one-third of cropland or pastureland, using the equivalent of about one-half of the gross annual forest growth for biomass energy, or implementing more intensive management to increase forest growth on one-third of forestland. Such large offsets would require substantial trade-offs, such as lower agricultural production and non-carbon ecosystem services from forests. The effectiveness of activities could be diluted by negative leakage effects and increasing disturbance regimes. Because forest carbon loss contributes to increasing climate risk and because climate change may impede regeneration following disturbance, avoiding deforestation and promoting regeneration after disturbance should receive high priority as policy considerations. Policies to encourage programs or projects that influence forest carbon sequestration and offset fossil fuel emissions should also consider major items such as leakage, the cyclical nature of forest growth and regrowth, and the extensive demand for and movement of forest products globally, and other greenhouse gas effects, such as methane and nitrous oxide emissions, and recognize other environmental benefits of forests, such as biodiversity, nutrient management, and watershed protection. Activities that contribute to helping forests adapt to the effects of climate change, and which also complement forest carbon storage strategies, would be prudent.

Current forest carbon offset buffer pools do not adequately insure against disturbance-driven carbon losses

Carbon, climate, and natural disturbance: a review of mechanisms, challenges, and tools for understanding forest carbon stability in an uncertain future

Variations of Carbon Allocation and Turnover Time Across Tropical Forests

Uncertainty in US forest carbon storage potential due to climate risks

Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests

Effective forest‐based climate change mitigation requires our best science

Pitfalls in forest carbon sink projection

Climate policies for carbon neutrality should not rely on the uncertain increase of carbon stocks in existing forests

Rapid turnover of connexin43 in the adult rat heart.

Where does the carbon go? Long-term effects of forest management on the carbon budget of a temperate-forest water-supply watershed

Tropical forest restoration under future climate change

Call for caution regarding the efficacy of large-scale afforestation and its hydrological effects

From sink to source: changing climate and disturbance regimes could tip the 21st century carbon balance of an unmanaged mountain forest landscape

Systematic over-crediting in California's forest carbon offsets program

A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States

Gross Changes in Forest Area Shape the Future Carbon Balance of Tropical Forests

Operational assessment tool for forest carbon dynamics for the United States: a new spatially explicit approach linking the LUCAS and CBM-CFS3 models

Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California

The Key Role of Forest Disturbance in Reconciling Estimates of the Northern Carbon Sink

Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems

Coarse Woody Debris Are Buffering Mortality-Induced Carbon Losses to the Atmosphere in Tropical Forests