Local nutrient addition drives plant biodiversity losses but not biotic homogenization in global grasslands

Qingqing Chen,Shane Blowes,Stan Harpole,Emma Ladouceur,Elizabeth Borer,Andrew MacDougall,Jonathan D. Bakker,Pedro Maximiliano Tognetti,Eric W. Seabloom,Pedro Daleo,Jason Martina,Christiane Roscher,Peter Adler,George Wheeler,Catalina Estrada,Carly Stevens,Ciska Veen,Anita C. Risch,Ian Donohue,Yann Hautier,Glenda Wardle,Sylvia Haider,Erika Hersch-Green,Yujie Niu,Pablo L. Peri,Sally A. Power,Anu Eskelinen,Daniel Gruner,Harry Olde Venterink,Carla D'Antonio,Marc Cadotte,Nico Eisenhauer,Risto Virtanen,Jane Catford,John Morgan,Michelle Tedder,Sumanta Bagchi,Caldeira Maria,Miguel Bugalho,Johannes Knops,Chris Dickman,Nicole Hagenah,Anke Jentsch,Petr Macek,Brooke Osborne,Lauri Laanisto,Jonathan Chase
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.27.586835
2024-06-24
Abstract:Nutrient enrichment typically causes local plant biodiversity decline due to losses of rare species and species with traits ill-suited for high nutrient levels. These local-scale losses can cause biotic homogenization at larger scales if they outpace losses of widespread species. This is a common, but untested, expectation. Using a standardized experiment across 72 grasslands on six continents, we found similar magnitudes of losses of spatially restricted and widespread species, causing proportional species loss at local and larger scales and no biotic homogenization, even up to 14 years of treatment. Such patterns of diversity changes held consistent across plant origins and life form variations. Thus, nutrient enrichment poses threats to all functional groups including dominant widespread species that are often critical for ecosystem functions and services.
Ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?