Abstract:A chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging (ChIA-PET) approach is used to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in several different stem-cell populations; putative long-range promoter–enhancer interactions are inferred, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection and prevalent cell-specific enhancer usage. Gene transcription requires dynamic chromatin connectivity between promoters bound by RNA polymerase II and their corresponding distal-acting enhancers. In this paper the authors use the ChIA-PET (chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging) approach to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells and neurosphere progenitor cells. Putative enhancer–promoter interactions can be inferred, and many enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection. This work illustrates the possible importance of underlying chromatin structures in nuclear function. In multicellular organisms, transcription regulation is one of the central mechanisms modelling lineage differentiation and cell-fate determination1. Transcription requires dynamic chromatin configurations between promoters and their corresponding distal regulatory elements2. It is believed that their communication occurs within large discrete foci of aggregated RNA polymerases termed transcription factories in three-dimensional nuclear space3. However, the dynamic nature of chromatin connectivity has not been characterized at the genome-wide level. Here, through a chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging approach3,4,5 using an antibody that primarily recognizes the pre-initiation complexes of RNA polymerase II6, we explore the transcriptional interactomes of three mouse cells of progressive lineage commitment, including pluripotent embryonic stem cells7, neural stem cells8 and neurosphere stem/progenitor cells9. Our global chromatin connectivity maps reveal approximately 40,000 long-range interactions, suggest precise enhancer–promoter associations and delineate cell-type-specific chromatin structures. Analysis of the complex regulatory repertoire shows that there are extensive colocalizations among promoters and distal-acting enhancers. Most of the enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that the linear juxtaposition is not the only guiding principle driving enhancer target selection. Although promoter–enhancer interactions exhibit high cell-type specificity, promoters involved in interactions are found to be generally common and mostly active among different cells. Chromatin connectivity networks reveal that the pivotal genes of reprogramming functions are transcribed within physical proximity to each other in embryonic stem cells, linking chromatin architecture to coordinated gene expression. Our study sets the stage for the full-scale dissection of spatial and temporal genome structures and their roles in orchestrating development.

Basal association of a transcription factor favors early gene expression

Transcribed enhancers lead waves of coordinated transcription in transitioning mammalian cells

Priming Epigenetic Landscape at Gene Promoters through Transcriptional Activation in Mammalian Germ Cells

Epromoters bind key stress-related transcription factors to regulate clusters of stress response genes

Enhancer-promoter communication in Drosophila developmental gene transcription

Compatibility rules of human enhancer and promoter sequences

Basis of gene-specific transcription regulation by the Integrator complex

Large-scale analysis of the integration of enhancer-enhancer signals by promoters

Interactome Maps of Mouse Gene Regulatory Domains Reveal Basic Principles of Transcriptional Regulation.

Chromatin Connectivity Maps Reveal Dynamic Promoter–enhancer Long-Range Associations

Preformed chromatin topology assists transcriptional robustness of Shh during limb development

A phylogenetically conserved cis-regulatory module in the Msx2 promoter is sufficient for BMP-dependent transcription in murine and Drosophila embryos

Multiple MAPK Cascades Regulate the Transcription of IME1, the Master Transcriptional Activator of Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Enhancer–promoter interactions become more instructive in the transition from cell-fate specification to tissue differentiation

Role of cell-type specific nucleosome positioning in inducible activation of mammalian promoters

Transcription Factor Binding Site in Promoter Determines the Pattern of Plasmid-Based Transgene Expression In Vivo

Promoter-proximal CTCF binding promotes distal enhancer-dependent gene activation

Transcription factor co-expression mediates lineage priming for embryonic and extra-embryonic differentiation

Extensive Promoter-Centered Chromatin Interactions Provide A Topological Basis for Transcription Regulation

Temporal constraints on enhancer usage shape the regulation of limb gene transcription