Misclassification of a frequent loss of function variant from pseudogene as a variant in Brazilian patients

Anthony Vladimir Campos Segura,Sara Iolanda Oliveira da Silva,Karina Miranda Santiago,Rafael Canfield Brianese,Dirce Maria Carraro,Giovana Tardin Torrezan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.26.24304914
2024-03-27
Abstract:, a Lynch Syndrome gene, presents challenges in genetic testing due to the existence of multiple pseudogenes. This study aims to describe a series of cases harboring a rare LoF variant in the pseudogene that has been incorrectly assigned to with different nomenclatures. We reviewed data from 647 Brazilian patients who underwent multigene genetic testing at a single center to identify those harboring the V1:c.2186_2187delTC or V2:c.2182_2184delACTinsG variants, allegedly located at exon 13. Gene-specific PCR and transcript sequencing was performed. Among the 647 individuals, 1.8% (12) carried the investigated variants, with variant allele frequencies ranging from 15 to 34%. By visually inspecting the alignments, we confirmed that both V1 and V2 represented the same variant and through gene-specific PCR and transcript analysis, we demonstrated that V1/V2 is actually located in the pseudogene. Genomic databases (ExAC and gnomAD) report an incidence of 2.5% - 5.3% of this variant in the African population. Currently, V1 is classified as “uncertain significance” and V2 as “conflicting” in ClinVar, with several laboratories classifying them as “pathogenic”. We identified a frequent African LoF variant in the Brazilian population that is misclassified as a variant. It is likely that V1/V2 have been erroneously assigned to in several manuscripts and by clinical laboratories, underscoring a disparity-induced matter. Considering the limitations of short-read NGS differentiating between certain regions of and , using complementary methodologies is imperative to provide an accurate diagnosis.
Genetic and Genomic Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?