Root surface treatment for delayed replantation of avulsed teeth in animal models: a systematic review

Stephanie Díaz Huaman,Marina Moscardini Vilela,Paulo Nelson-Filho,Andiara De Rossi,Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz,Francisco Wanderley Garcia Paula-Silva
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.24.586399
2024-03-27
Abstract:The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the effectiveness of different types of root surface treatment materials used in delayed replanted teeth following tooth avulsion in animal models. A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Two reviewers performed a database search for studies published between January 1966 and April 2019 which were indexed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Bireme databases. Studies performed , in animal models with an avulsion/delayed replantation design (≥ 20 min of extra oral dry time) that evaluated the use of different materials for root surface treatment were included. The assessment for risk of bias was performed following recommendations included in Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. We found 21 types of materials used for root surface treatment alone and 29 materials used with associations. Stannous fluoride, sodium fluoride, citric acid, doxycycline, Emdogain, alendronate, minocycline, Odanacatib, MFR buffer, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein, gallium nitrate, acidulated phosphate fluoride, vitamin C, propolis, zoledronic acid, diode laser, indomethacin, fibrin sealant, adipose-tissue derived stem cells treatment and basic fibroblast growth gel. After Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, four studies were scored as low quality of evidence, fifteen studies with moderate quality and six with high quality of evidence. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity among studies and materials used for root surface treatment and therefore it was not possible to ascertain which material or protocol present better efficacy when used as root surface treatment material.
Pharmacology and Toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the in - vivo effectiveness of different root - surface - treatment materials in delayed replantation of teeth, in order to improve the healing effect after tooth replantation. Specifically, the study aims to systematically review the application effects of root - surface - treatment materials for delayed replantation of teeth in animal models, so as to determine which materials or treatment methods can better prevent inflammatory resorption and promote the repair of the periodontal ligament. ### Research Background Dental trauma is one of the common emergencies in oral health centers, and the most serious one is tooth avulsion. When a tooth is completely detached from the alveolar socket due to external force, it will seriously damage the periodontal tissue, resulting in the destruction of the periodontal ligament (PDL) and the neurovascular bundle, and expose the periodontal tissue to the external environment, which is easily contaminated. Therefore, the goal of replantation surgery is to restore the vitality of the periodontal ligament and the dental pulp, but its success is affected by many factors. In particular, when the tooth stays in the external environment for too long (more than 60 minutes), it may lead to the necrosis of periodontal ligament cells and dental pulp, root resorption and ultimately tooth loss. ### Research Objectives In view of the above problems, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the in - vivo effectiveness of different types of root - surface - treatment materials in delayed replantation of teeth through systematic review, especially in animal models. Specific objectives include: - Identifying and evaluating different materials used for root - surface treatment. - Analyzing the effects of these materials on periodontal ligament repair, inflammatory response and root resorption. - Exploring whether there is a certain material or treatment method that can significantly improve the success rate of delayed replantation of teeth. ### Methods The researchers conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA statement and searched for relevant literatures published from 1966 to 2019. The inclusion criteria were: - In - vivo experiments in animal models. - The experimental design included tooth avulsion and delayed replantation (dry - standing time of ≥20 minutes). - The effects of different root - surface - treatment materials were evaluated. ### Results After screening, 25 articles were finally included for detailed analysis. The results showed that although a variety of materials have been used for root - surface treatment, due to the large heterogeneity among studies, meta - analysis could not be carried out. In addition, the quality of the studies varied, and the quality of some studies was low, which might affect the reliability of the conclusions. ### Discussion At present, there is no clear evidence indicating which root - surface - treatment material is the best choice. Although some materials such as fluoride, citric acid, doxycycline, etc. show certain effects, they lack unified standards and high - quality research support. Future research needs more rigorous design and standardized experimental conditions to further clarify the optimal root - surface - treatment plan. In conclusion, this study reveals the complexity and uncertainty of root - surface - treatment materials in delayed replantation of teeth, and emphasizes the methodological issues that need to be concerned in future research.