Abstract:Rampoldi et al. queried two uromodulin (UMOD) haplotyping issues in their letter.1.Rampoldi L. Köttgen A. Devuyst O. The Effect of common uromodulin variants on urinary protein level and gene transcription.Kidney Int. 2013; 84: 410-411Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar Here we reply in hopes of clarification and simplification. Q-1: Mixing alleles from forward and reverse strands, and the haplotypes used in the UMOD promoter luciferase analysis. First of all, we should clarify that the alleles, diploid genotypes, and haplotypes that we used during functional characterization of UMOD promoter/luciferase plasmids were all from the sense strand, as illustrated in sequence readouts from our reporter plasmids (Figure 1a); the three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the proximal UMOD promoter are (sense strand) rs13333226 (T>C), rs6497476 (A>G), and rs4293393 (T>C). In our construction of promoter/reporters vector, we obtained promoter inserts (PCR products) from human samples with primers designed according to the reference sequence (RefSeq clone, sense strand) from the UCSC genome database. Thus, our promoter/reporter luciferase results are based on the correct alleles at the three SNPs. The actual sense-strand alleles of these three SNPs in the original promoter haplotype are TAT (Figure 1a). To create different sense-strand haplotypes (Figure 1b), we used site-directed mutagenesis followed by resequencing to verify the correct alleles. However, we did introduce an element of uncertainty into the manuscript by reporting haplotypes based on both forward and reverse strands: rs13333226 A/G (antisense strand), rs6497476 T/C (antisense strand), and rs4293393 T/C (sense strand), rs719800 G/A (antisense strand), rs11859916G/A (antisense strand), rs4283153 C/T (sense strand), and rs4632135A/G (sense strand). One can design SNP assays (for haplotyping) based on either the forward or reverse strands. The subsequent haplotype analysis will then yield the same number and frequency of haplotypes, but differences at antisense-strand SNP identities (e.g., C/T vs. G/A). Unfortunately, we kept the mixed (sense/antisense) nomenclature in the haplotypes, and for internal consistency carried that nomenclature into the descriptions of the promoter. In retrospect, we should have changed all antisense bases in each haplotype to the bases in the sense strand: rs13333226 (T>C), rs6497476 (A>G), and rs4293393 (T>C). What led us to the awkwardness of mixing strands? We initially considered that, in many previous reports on UMOD, investigators were accustomed to referring to rs13333226 A/G (antisense strand), rs6497476 T/C (antisense strand), and rs4293393 C/T (sense strand), and we wanted to remain consistent with past nomenclature. But clearly we created more confusion than clarity. We hope that Figures 1a and b begin to clarify the strand issues. Q-2: The second question was about longer haplotype association analyses with urinary uromodulin level. At the end of the day, the question of highest interest here is whether genetic variants at the UMOD locus can predict UMOD protein excretion into the urine; i.e., is there a UMOD cis-QTL, especially in the proximal promoter? To answer this question, we typed the UCSD twin cohort for UMOD excretion (i.e., urine UMOD/creatinine), and then tested the effect of two UMOD promoter variants on the trait: rs13333226 (T>C, sense strand) and rs4293393 (T>C, sense strand). These two SNPs, in perfect linkage disequilibrium (LD) (R2=1.0), were both highly predictive (each P-value=2.01E-06) of UMOD/creatinine, in an additive genetic model (C/C30kbp. Initially, this seemed reasonable, as the overall HapMap LD plot for the CHB (Chinese-Han-Beijing) population indicated stretches of LD (by D′) spanning the entire UMOD locus, and up to ∼35kbp (ref. 2; main paper, supplementary Figure S1 online), albeit with internal blocks wherein LD declines. However, both you (your Figure 1b) and we2.Han J. Chen Y. Liu Y. et al.Common variants of the UMOD promoter associated with blood pressure in a community-based Chinese cohort.Hypertens Res. 2012; 35: 769-774Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar,3.Han J. Liu Y. Rao F. et al.Common genetic variants of the human uromodulin gene regulate transcription and predict plasma uric acid levels.Kidney Int. 2013; 83: 733-740Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar have shown, by custom plots in HaploView, that as many as three LD blocks may span this region, diminishing the feasibility of an extended haplotype approach. In the end, the entire controversy may be rendered moot by the association of UMOD excretion with UMOD promoter variants in the UCSD twins (Table 1).

Phenotypic spectrum of - haplotype composition in a general population sample

Common variants in Mendelian kidney disease genes and their association with renal function

Genome-wide Association Analyses Identify 18 New Loci Associated with Serum Urate Concentrations.

Systematic mediation and interaction analyses of kidney function genetic loci in a general population study

Association analysis of 10 candidate genes causing Mendelian calcium nephrolithiasis in the INCIPE study: a South European general population cohort

Genome-wide Maps of Human Kidney Proximal Tubules and Thick Ascending Limbs of Henle Reveal an Enrichment for Human Blood Pressure Associated Polymorphisms

Novel genetic associations with serum level metabolites identified by phenotype set enrichment analyses.

Whole genome sequence analyses of eGFR in 23,732 people representing multiple ancestries in the NHLBI trans-omics for precision medicine (TOPMed) consortium

Search for an Association Between the Human CYP1A2 Genotype and CYP1A2 Metabolic Phenotype.

Variants in tubule epithelial regulatory elements mediate most heritable differences in human kidney function

Enrichment analysis and chromosomal distribution of gout susceptible loci identified by genome-wide association studies

Dense mapping of MYH9 localizes the strongest kidney disease associations to the region of introns 13 to 15

Chromatin Conformation Links Distal Target Genes to CKD Loci

X-chromosome and kidney function: evidence from a multi-trait genetic analysis of 908,697 individuals reveals sex-specific and sex-differential findings in genes regulated by androgen response elements

Target genes, variants, tissues and transcriptional pathways influencing human serum urate levels

Phenome-wide analysis reveals epistatic associations between APOL1 variants and chronic kidney disease and multiple other disorders

A haplotype in CFH family genes confers high risk of rare glomerular nephropathies

Genetic Determinants Influencing Human Serum Metabolome among African Americans

Phenomewide Association Study of Health Outcomes Associated With the Genetic Correlates of 25 Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration and Vitamin D Binding Protein Concentration

Reply to Rampoldi Et Al.