GWAS-informed data integration and non-coding CRISPRi screen illuminate genetic etiology of bone mineral density

Mitchell Conery,James A. Pippin,Yadav Wagley,Khanh Trang,Matthew C. Pahl,David A. Villani,Lacey J. Favazzo,Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell,Michael J. Zuscik,Eugene Katsevich,Andrew D. Wells,Babette S. Zemel,Benjamin F. Voight,Kurt D. Hankenson,Alessandra Chesi,Struan F.A. Grant
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.19.585778
2024-03-20
Abstract:Over 1,100 independent signals have been identified with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for bone mineral density (BMD), a key risk factor for mortality-increasing fragility fractures; however, the effector gene(s) for most remain unknown. Informed by a variant-to-gene mapping strategy implicating 89 non-coding elements predicted to regulate osteoblast gene expression at BMD GWAS loci, we executed a single-cell CRISPRi screen in human fetal osteoblast 1.19 cells (hFOBs). The BMD relevance of hFOBs was supported by heritability enrichment from cross-cell type stratified LD-score regression involving 98 cell types grouped into 15 tissues. 24 genes showed perturbation in the screen, with four ( , , , and ) exhibiting consistent effects upon siRNA knockdown on three measures of osteoblast maturation and mineralization. Lastly, additional heritability enrichments, genetic correlations, and multi-trait fine-mapping revealed that many BMD GWAS signals are pleiotropic and likely mediate their effects via non-bone tissues that warrant attention in future screens.
Genomics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?