Abstract:Background: The need for increased clinical efficacy and efficiency has been the main force in developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools in medical imaging. The INCISIVE project is a European Union-funded initiative aiming to revolutionize cancer imaging methods using AI technology. It seeks to address limitations in imaging techniques by developing an AI-based toolbox that improves accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, interpretability, and cost-effectiveness. Objective: To ensure the successful implementation of the INCISIVE AI service, a study was conducted to understand the needs, challenges, and expectations of health care professionals (HCPs) regarding the proposed toolbox and any potential implementation barriers. Methods: A mixed methods study consisting of 2 phases was conducted. Phase 1 involved user experience (UX) design workshops with users of the INCISIVE AI toolbox. Phase 2 involved a Delphi study conducted through a series of sequential questionnaires. To recruit, a purposive sampling strategy based on the project's consortium network was used. In total, 16 HCPs from Serbia, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Spain, and the United Kingdom participated in the UX design workshops and 12 completed the Delphi study. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp), enabling the calculation of mean rank scores of the Delphi study's lists. The qualitative data collected via the UX design workshops was analyzed using NVivo (version 12; Lumivero) software. Results: The workshops facilitated brainstorming and identification of the INCISIVE AI toolbox's desired features and implementation barriers. Subsequently, the Delphi study was instrumental in ranking these features, showing a strong consensus among HCPs (W=0.741, P<.001). Additionally, this study also identified implementation barriers, revealing a strong consensus among HCPs (W=0.705, P<.001). Key findings indicated that the INCISIVE AI toolbox could assist in areas such as misdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, delays in diagnosis, detection of minor lesions, decision-making in disagreement, treatment allocation, disease prognosis, prediction, treatment response prediction, and care integration throughout the patient journey. Limited resources, lack of organizational and managerial support, and data entry variability were some of the identified barriers. HCPs also had an explicit interest in AI explainability, desiring feature relevance explanations or a combination of feature relevance and visual explanations within the toolbox. Conclusions: The results provide a thorough examination of the INCISIVE AI toolbox's design elements as required by the end users and potential barriers to its implementation, thus guiding the design and implementation of the INCISIVE technology. The outcome offers information about the degree of AI explainability required of the INCISIVE AI toolbox across the three services: (1) initial diagnosis; (2) disease staging, differentiation, and characterization; and (3) treatment and follow-up indicated for the toolbox. By considering the perspective of end users, INCISIVE aims to develop a solution that effectively meets their needs and drives adoption.

New implementation of data standards for AI in oncology. Experience from the EuCanImage project.

Data infrastructures for AI in medical imaging: a report on the experiences of five EU projects

Documenting the de-identification process of clinical and imaging data for AI for health imaging projects

A framework for validating AI in precision medicine: considerations from the European ITFoC consortium

CHAIMELEON Project: Creation of a Pan-European Repository of Health Imaging Data for the Development of AI-Powered Cancer Management Tools

Artificial intelligence and hybrid imaging: the best match for personalized medicine in oncology

Joint Imaging Platform for Federated Clinical Data Analytics

All you need is Data Preparation: A Systematic Review of Image Harmonization Techniques in Multi-center/device Studies for Medical Support Systems

Responsible AI practice and AI education are central to AI implementation: a rapid review for all medical imaging professionals in Europe

Data harmonisation for information fusion in digital healthcare: A state-of-the-art systematic review, meta-analysis and future research directions

A new AI-assisted data standard accelerates interoperability in biomedical research

Advancing Medical Imaging Research Through Standardization

Quality medical data management within an open AI architecture – cancer patients case

Standardizing digital biobanks: integrating imaging, genomic, and clinical data for precision medicine

AI frontiers in oncology: Bridging the gap between humanity and machine.

Enabling semantic interoperability in multi-centric clinical trials on breast cancer

The use of AI technologies in cancer care

Enabling Global Image Data Sharing in the Life Sciences

Translation of tissue-based artificial intelligence into clinical practice: from discovery to adoption

Cancer care at the time of the fourth industrial revolution: an insight to healthcare professionals' perspectives on cancer care and artificial intelligence

Artificial Intelligence for Optimizing Cancer Imaging: User Experience Study