Randomized Controlled Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Risk Model-Guided Clinical Decision Support for Suicide Screening

Colin G. Walsh,Michael A. Ripperger,Laurie Novak,Carrie Reale,Shilo Anders,Ashley Spann,Jhansi Kolli,Katelyn Robinson,Qingxia Chen,David Isaacs,Lealani Mae Y. Acosta,Fenna Phibbs,Elliot Fielstein,Drew Wilimitis,Katherine Musacchio Schafer,Rachel Hilton,Dan Albert,Jill Shelton,Jessica Stroh,William W. Stead,Kevin B. Johnson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24304318
2024-03-18
Abstract:Suicide prevention requires risk identification, appropriate intervention, and follow-up. Traditional risk identification relies on patient self-reporting, support network reporting, or face-to-face screening with validated instruments or history and physical exam. In the last decade, statistical risk models have been studied and more recently deployed to augment clinical judgment. Models have generally been found to be low precision or problematic at scale due to low incidence. Few have been tested in clinical practice, and none have been tested in clinical trials to our knowledge.
Health Informatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses how to effectively utilize Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems in suicide prevention. The study compared two types of CDS - interruptive and non-interruptive - in guiding suicide screening through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Both types of CDS are based on real-time validated statistical risk models used to identify patients with a high risk of suicide attempts. The main issue is how to improve the efficiency and accuracy of identifying suicide risk and implementing appropriate interventions, especially in environments like neurological outpatient clinics where universal screening is not conducted. The trial results showed that interruptive CDS led to more high-risk patients undergoing further screening (42% vs. 4%), while non-interruptive CDS had a higher proportion of documented assessments but a lower number of actual screenings. The study also emphasized the need for larger-scale RCTs to validate the effectiveness of these CDS systems in reducing suicidal self-harm.