Zapping the brain to enhance sport performance? Evidence from an umbrella review of the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on physical performance

Darías Holgado,Daniel Sanabria,Miguel A. Vadillo,Rafael Román-Caballero

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303915

2024-03-09

Abstract:Concepts such as "neuro-doping" or brain doping have contributed to an expansion in the area of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and its impact over exercise and physical performance in recent years. Here we assess the evidence supporting the healthy population using an umbrella review of meta-analyses investigating the role of tDCS to enhance exercise performance. We identified 9 meta-analyses encompassing 50 crossover studies and 683 participants that met our inclusion criteria. Despite the fact that most meta-analyses reported a positive effect of tDCS, our analyses revealed overly low statistical power in the primary studies, publication bias, and large variability in pre-processing and analytic decisions. Indeed, a specification-curve analysis showed that the final effect could range from = −0.23 to = 0.33, depending on decisions such as the formula used for estimating the effect size and multiple additional analytic steps. Moreover, a meta-analysis of all the primary studies included in the umbrella review showed a small effect of tDCS ( = 0.28, 95%CI [0.18, 0.39]) that became substantially smaller and inconclusive after accounting for publication bias, = 0.10, 95%CrI [−0.04, 0.20], = 0.99. In summary, our findings highlight that current evidence, from both individual studies and meta-analyses, does not conclusively support the idea that tDCS enhances performance outcomes.

Sports Medicine

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to evaluate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor performance enhancement. In recent years, with the popularization of the concept of "neuroenhancers" or "brain enhancers", the application of tDCS in the field of sports and physical performance has attracted more and more attention. Researchers examined 50 cross-studies and data from 683 healthy participants through an umbrella review, focusing primarily on the effects of tDCS on physical performance.

Although most meta-analyses reported positive effects of tDCS, the study found that the statistical power of the original studies was low, there were publication biases, and there was a substantial variability in preprocessing and analysis decisions. Through norm curve analysis, the results showed that the final effect size could range from g = -0.23 to g = 0.33, depending on various analysis decisions. Furthermore, considering publication bias, the effect of tDCS on motor performance was significantly reduced and became inconclusive.

The paper concludes that the current evidence does not strongly support the significant enhancement of motor performance by tDCS. The study also emphasizes the need for further understanding of long-term stimulation effects, influencing factors, and stimulation methods. Therefore, the effectiveness of tDCS as an adjunct to improve motor performance remains controversial.