Adaptive trade-offs between vertebrate defense and insect predation drive ant venom evolution

Axel Touchard,Samuel D. Robinson,Hadrien Lalagüe,Steven Ascoët,Arnaud Billet,Alain Dejean,Nathan J. Téné,Frédéric Petitclerc,Valérie Troispoux,Michel Treilhou,Elsa Bonnafé,Irina Vetter,Joel Vizueta,Corrie S. Moreau,Jérôme Orivel,Niklas Tysklind
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.06.583705
2024-03-11
Abstract:Stinging ants have diversified into various ecological niches, and several evolutionary drivers may have contributed to shape the composition of their venom. To comprehend the drivers underlying venom variation in ants, we selected 15 Neotropical species and recorded a range of traits, including ecology, morphology, and venom bioactivity. Principal component analysis of both morphological and venom bioactivity traits revealed that stinging ants display two functional strategies. Additionally, phylogenetic comparative analysis indicated that venom function (predatory, defensive, or both) and mandible morphology significantly correlate with venom bioactivity and amount, while pain-inducing activity trades off with insect paralysis. Further analysis of the venom biochemistry of the 15 species revealed switches between cytotoxic and neurotoxic venom compositions in some species. This study highlights the fact that ant venoms are not homogenous, and for some species, there are major shifts in venom composition associated with the diversification of venom ecological functions.
Ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?