Quorum sensing in Mycobacteria: understanding the recognition machinery conundrum through an approach

vani Janakiraman,Krovvidi Phani Sarath Teja
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.06.583649
2024-03-11
Abstract:Bacteria employ a cell-to-cell communication process called quorum sensing (QS) to orchestrate group behaviors like exo-factors and host-adapted traits. The QS machinery in gram negative bacteria comprises of LuxR proteins (and their homologs) that are transcription factors which recognize and bind to the classical signaling molecules acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs). On the other hand, QS in gram positive bacteria is mediated through autoinducer peptides recognized by two-component systems (TCS). However, in acid-fast bacteria, the very process of QS and the underlying molecular machinery remains elusive. In the present work, we have investigated the proteins annotated as LuxR family proteins of the clinically important genera of the acid-fast bacteria, mycobacteria through computational analysis. We have chosen (Mtb), the etiological agent of tuberculosis and a most widely used model system for Mycobacterial studies, . A total of 17 genes annotated as LuxR homologs (7 from Mtb and 10 from ) were analyzed. We found that only 14 of these proteins (5 from Mtb and 9 from ) harbor the HTH motif typical to the LuxR/FixJ superfamily of transcriptional regulators affirming their belonging to LuxR family. Rv0894 and MSMEG_0545 both annotated as LuxR homologs, do not harbor HTH motif and RegX (also annotated as LuxR homolog) does not have the tetra helical HTH which is the characteristic of LuxR/FixJ superfamily and hence are not LuxR family proteins. Interestingly, most of the LuxR family proteins (2 in Mtb and 6 in ) are response regulators (RRs) that harbor REC domain that is involved in phosphotransfer from the histidine kinases (HK) thus forming a TCS involved in physiological processes. Few of them have their cognate HKs while few are orphan regulators. The remaining of the proteins harbor various sensory domains that include MalT, PAS, GAF, AcyC, ATPase, TPR, TOMM, and HchA which are either enzymes or bind to small ligand or proteins. STITCH-an online protein-chemical interaction server in deed revealed various small molecules including c-di-GMP (QS molecule in ), and 3-oxo-C12-HSL (a QS signal in ) binding to the ligand-harboring LuxR proteins. Our study not only confirms the authenticity of Mycobacterial LuxRs but also reveals the diversity of domains in the proteins annotated as LuxR family members in mycobacteria. This type of domain organization is strikingly different from the classical quorum sensing machinery of other bacteria, which might have evolved for a hitherto unknown multifunctionality including QS.
Bioinformatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper discusses the mechanism of intercellular communication - quorum sensing (QS) in Mycobacteria, especially the role of LuxR family proteins. In most bacteria, QS coordinates collective behavior through cell density-dependent mechanisms, but this process in Mycobacteria is not well understood. Researchers studied LuxR family proteins in clinically important Mycobacterium species, including the pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and the model system Mycobacterium smegmatis, using computational analysis methods. The study found that although these LuxR proteins are typically associated with transcription factors, not all proteins have typical LuxR/FixJ superfamily features, such as the presence of HTH domains. Researchers identified some proteins with response regulator (RR) REC domains, involved in two-component systems (TCS) that may involve phosphotransfer. Some LuxR proteins also have additional sensory domains such as MalT, PAS, and GAF, which may bind to different small molecule ligands and participate in QS or stress response processes. The paper points out that LuxR family proteins in Mycobacteria are structurally and functionally more diverse than QS machinery in other bacteria, which may reflect their multifunctionality in different physiological processes, including possible quorum sensing. Since known LuxR proteins do not have paired LuxI synthases, this suggests that Mycobacteria may use different signaling molecules and activation mechanisms. In addition, some proteins may function as orphan regulators without known paired signal generators. In summary, this paper aims to uncover the specific details of the quorum sensing mechanism in Mycobacteria, particularly the diversity and potential functions of LuxR family proteins, which are typically associated with quorum sensing in other types of bacteria but their roles and recognition mechanisms in Mycobacteria remain unclear.