Evaluation of Bayesian Point-Based System on the Variant Classification of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Genes

Mohammad K. Eldomery,Jamie L. Maciaszek,Taylor Cain,Victor Pastor Loyola,Suraj Sarvode Mothi,David A. Wheeler,Li Tang,Lu Wang,Jeffery M. Klco,Patrick R. Blackburn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.04.24303679
2024-05-27
Abstract:Purpose: To assess the differences in variant classifications using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines and the Bayesian point-based classification system (here referred to as the point system) in 115 hereditary cancer predisposition genes and explore the utility of the point system in variant sub-tiering. Methods: Germline variant classifications for 721 pediatric patients from an in-house panel were retrospectively evaluated using the two scoring systems. Results: 2376 unique variants were identified. The point system exhibited a lower rate of unique variants of uncertain significance (VUS) of ~15% compared to ~36% using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines (p-value < 0.001). This reduction is attributed to the classification of variants as likely benign with one benign supporting evidence (~12%) or one benign strong evidence (~4%) using the point system. In addition, the point system resolves conflicting criteria/evidence not recognized by the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines (~5%). Sub-tiering unique VUS calls by the point system indicates ~11.5% were VUS-Low (0-1 points), while the remaining ~3.5% were VUS-Mid (2-3 points) and VUS-High (4-5 points). Conclusion: The point system reduces the VUS rate and facilitates sub-tiering. Future large-scale studies are warranted to explore the impact of the point system on improving VUS reporting and/or VUS clinical management.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?