CACHE Challenge #1: targeting the WDR domain of LRRK2, a Parkinson's Disease associated protein.
Suzanne Ackloo,Cheryl H. Arrowsmith,Fuqiang Ban,Christopher J. Barden,Hartmut Beck,Jan Beranek,Francois Berenger,Albina Bolotokova,Guillaume Bret,Marko Breznik,Emanuele Carosati,Irene Chau,Yu Chen,Artem Cherkasov,Dennis Della Corte,Katrin Denzinger,Aiping Dong,Sorin Draga,Ian Dunn,Kristina Edfeldt,Aled Edwards,Merveille Eguida,Paul Eisenhuth,Lukas Friedrich,Alexander Fuerll,Spencer Gardiner,Francesco Gentile,Pegah Ghiabi,Elisa Gibson,Marta Glavatskikh,Christoph Gorgulla,Judith Guenther,Anders Gunnarsson,Filipp Guseve,Evgeny Gutkin,Alexander Hillisch,Laurent Hoffer,Anders Hogner,John J Irwin,Olexandr Isayev,Aleksandra Ivanova,Celien Jacquemard,Austin J Jarrett,Jan H. Jensen,Dmitri Kireev,Julian Kleber,S. Benjamin Koby,David Koes,Ashutosh Kumar,Maria G. Kurnikova,Alina Kutlushina,Uta Lessel,Fengling Li,Fabian Liessmann,Sijie Liu,Wei Lu,Jens Meiler,Akhila Mettu,Guzel Minibaeva,Rocco Moretti,Connor J Morris,Chamali Narangoda,Theresa Noonan,Leon Obendorf,Szymon Pach,Amit Pandit,Sumera Perveen,Gennady Poda,Pavel Polishchuk,Kristina Puls,Vera Putter,Didier Rognan,Dylan Roskams-Edris,Matthieu Schapira,Christina Schindler,Francois Sindt,Vojtech Spiwok,Casper Steinmann,Rick L. Stevens,Valerij Talagayev,Damon Tingey,Oanh Vu,W. Patrick Walters,Xiaowen Wang,Zhenyu Wang,Gerhard Wolber,Clemens Alexander Wolf,Lars Wortmann,Carlos A. Zepeda,Kam Y. J. Zhang,Jixian Zhang,Shuangjia Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.18.603797
2024-08-14
Abstract:The CACHE challenges are a series of prospective benchmarking exercises meant to evaluate progress in the field of computational hit-finding. Here we report the results of the inaugural CACHE #1 challenge in which 23 computational teams each selected up to 100 commercially available compounds that they predicted would bind to the WDR domain of the Parkinson's disease target LRRK2, a domain with no known ligand and only an apo structure in the PDB. The lack of known binding data and presumably low druggability of the target is a challenge to computational hit finding methods. Seventy-three of the 1955 procured molecules bound LRRK2 in an SPR assay with KD lower than 150 μM and were advanced to a hit expansion phase where computational teams each selected up to 50 analogs each. Binding was observed in two orthogonal assays with affinities ranging from 18 to 140 μM for seven chemically diverse series. The seven successful computational workflows varied in their screening strategies and techniques. Three used molecular dynamics to produce a conformational ensemble of the targeted site, three included a fragment docking step, three implemented a generative design strategy and five used one or more deep learning steps. CACHE #1 reflects a highly exploratory phase in computational drug design where participants sometimes adopted strikingly diverging screening strategies. Machine-learning accelerated methods achieved similar results to brute force (e.g. exhaustive) docking. First-in-class, experimentally confirmed compounds were rare and weakly potent, indicating that recent advances are not sufficient to effectively address challenging targets.
Biochemistry