Abstract:Humans do not have an accurate representation of probability information in the environment but distort it in a surprisingly stereotyped way (“probability distortion”), as shown in a wide range of judgment and decision-making tasks. Many theories hypothesize that humans automatically compensate for the uncertainty inherent in probability information (“representational uncertainty”) and probability distortion is a consequence of uncertainty compensation. Here we examined whether and how the representational uncertainty of probability is quantified in the human brain and its relevance to probability distortion behavior. Human subjects (13 female and 9 male) kept tracking the relative frequency of one color of dot in a sequence of dot arrays while their brain activity was recorded by MEG. We found converging evidence from both neural entrainment and time-resolved decoding analysis that a mathematically derived measure of representational uncertainty is automatically computed in the brain, despite it is not explicitly required by the task. In particular, the encodings of relative frequency and its representational uncertainty, respectively, occur at latencies of ∼300 and 400 ms. The relative strength of the brain responses to these two quantities correlates with the probability distortion behavior. The automatic and fast encoding of the representational uncertainty provides neural basis for the uncertainty compensation hypothesis of probability distortion. More generally, since representational uncertainty is closely related to confidence estimation, our findings exemplify how confidence might emerge before perceptual judgment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Human perception of probabilities and relative frequencies can be markedly distorted, which is a potential source of disastrous decisions. But the brain is not just ignorant of probability; probability distortions are highly patterned and similar across different tasks. Recent theoretical work suggests that probability distortions arise from the brain's compensation of its own uncertainty in representing probability. Is such representational uncertainty really computed in the brain? To answer this question, we asked human subjects to track an ongoing stimulus sequence of relative frequencies and recorded their brain responses using MEG. Indeed, we found that the neural encoding of representational uncertainty accompanies that of relative frequency, although the former is not explicitly required by the task.

A nonlinear code for event probability in the human brain

Revealing nonlinear neural decoding by analyzing choices

A Radically New Theory of how the Brain Represents and Computes with Probabilities

Analog and digital codes in the brain

Probabilistic models, compressible interactions, and neural coding

A neural code supporting prospective probabilistic reasoning for instrumental information demand in humans

Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference

How does the brain compute with probabilities?

High-Fidelity Coding with Correlated Neurons

Neuronal sequences in population bursts encode information in human cortex

Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex

Neural stochastic codes, encoding and decoding

Learning probability distributions of sensory inputs with Monte Carlo Predictive Coding

Neural Correlates of Optimal Multisensory Decision Making under Time-Varying Reliabilities with an Invariant Linear Probabilistic Population Code

Neural signatures of temporal anticipation in human cortex represent event probability density

Self-organization of nonlinearly coupled neural fluctuations into synergistic population codes

Cracking neural coding by nonlinear physics

Beta Distribution of Human MTL Neuron Sparsity: A Sparse and Skewed Code

Identification of Probabilities

Computational Approaches to Access Probabilistic Population Codes for Higher Cognition an Decision-Making

Automatic and Fast Encoding of Representational Uncertainty Underlies the Distortion of Relative Frequency