Controlling the human connectome with spatially diffuse input signals

Richard Betzel,Maria Grazia Puxeddu,Caio Seguin,Vincent Bazinet,Andrea Luppi,Alina Podschun,S. Parker Singleton,Joshua Faskowitz,Vibin Parakkattu,Bratislav Misic,Sebastian Markett,Amy Kuceyeski,Linden Parkes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.27.581006

2024-02-28

Abstract:The human brain is never at “rest”; its activity is constantly fluctuating over time, transitioning from one brain state–a whole-brain pattern of activity–to another. Network control theory offers a framework for understanding the effort – energy – associated with these transitions. One branch of control theory that is especially useful in this context is “optimal control”, in which input signals are used to selectively drive the brain into a target state. Typically, these inputs are introduced independently to the nodes of the network (each input signal is associated with exactly one node). Though convenient, this input strategy ignores the continuity of cerebral cortex – geometrically, each region is connected to its spatial neighbors, allowing control signals, both exogenous and endogenous, to spread from their foci to nearby regions. Additionally, the spatial specificity of brain stimulation techniques is limited, such that the effects of a perturbation are measurable in tissue surrounding the stimulation site. Here, we adapt the network control model so that input signals have a spatial extent that decays exponentially from the input site. We show that this more realistic strategy takes advantage of spatial dependencies in structural connectivity and activity to reduce the energy (effort) associated with brain state transitions. We further leverage these dependencies to explore near-optimal control strategies such that, on a per-transition basis, the number of input signals required for a given control task is reduced, in some cases by two orders of magnitude. This approximation yields network-wide maps of input site density, which we compare to an existing database of functional, metabolic, genetic, and neurochemical maps, finding a close correspondence. Ultimately, not only do we propose a more efficient framework that is also more adherent to well-established brain organizational principles, but we also posit neurobiologically grounded bases for optimal control.

Neuroscience

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to more effectively control the transitions between states in the human brain network, especially in the case of introducing spatially diffusive input signals. Traditional methods usually assume that each input signal only acts on one specific node, ignoring the spatial continuity of the cerebral cortex and the spatial limitations of actual stimulation techniques. This paper proposes a new strategy, that is, by modifying the input matrix to consider the spatial proximity relationships between nodes, so that the input signal can affect its nearby areas in an exponentially decaying manner. This method is not only more in line with the actual organizational principles of the brain, but also shows significant advantages in reducing the control energy requirements.

### Specific Problems and Methods

1. **Problem Definition**:
- Researchers are concerned with how to drive the brain to transition from one state to another target state by optimizing the input signal.
- Traditional optimal control theory assumes that each input signal only acts on one node, and this assumption has limitations in practical applications, especially in non - invasive brain stimulation techniques, where the input signal often affects the surrounding area.

2. **Method Innovation**:
- A new input strategy, namely the "spatially diffusive input strategy", is proposed, in which each input signal not only acts on one node, but also affects its surrounding nodes in an exponentially decaying manner.
- By modifying the input matrix, the weight of the input signal monotonically decreases as the distance increases, thus more realistically simulating the actual brain stimulation process.

3. **Experimental Design**:
- Use a multi - modal human imaging data set, including diffusion spectrum imaging and resting - state functional imaging data.
- Define 11 empirically - based brain states and calculate the energy required for the transitions between these states.
- Compare the differences in control energy requirements between the traditional "local" input strategy and the new "spatially diffusive" input strategy.

### Main Findings

1. **Reduction in Energy Requirements**:
- The spatially diffusive input strategy requires significantly less control energy than the local input strategy in most cases.
- This energy reduction is particularly evident when the target state has a high similarity to the input state.

2. **Different Control Trajectories**:
- The control trajectories generated by the spatially diffusive input strategy are different from those of the local input strategy, especially under low - value diffusion parameters, and the trajectories generated by the spatial model are more indirect.
- As the diffusion parameter increases, the difference between the two strategies gradually decreases.

3. **Regional Control Energy Distribution**:
- The spatially diffusive input strategy requires less control energy in most brain regions, but in some specific regions (such as the salience/ventral attention network), the energy requirement actually increases.
- The energy changes in these regions are related to specific neurochemical characteristics, such as the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT).

4. **Compressibility of Input Signals**:
- Many input signals are highly correlated, indicating that the actual control input dimension is much smaller than the current input quantity.
- By constructing low - dimensional typical input signals, the optimal control can be effectively approximated while significantly reducing the required number of input signals.

### Conclusion

By introducing the spatially diffusive input strategy, this paper not only improves the control efficiency, but also provides a new perspective for understanding the control mechanisms of the brain network. This method, while reducing the control energy requirements, better simulates the effects of actual brain stimulation techniques and provides an important reference for future research and applications.