Abstract:Modern coexistence theory (MCT) offers a conceptually straightforward approach for connecting empirical observations with an elegant theoretical framework, gaining popularity rapidly over the past decade. However, beneath this surface‐level simplicity lie various assumptions and subjective choices made during data analysis. These can lead researchers to draw qualitatively different conclusions from the same set of experiments. As the predictions of MCT studies are often treated as outcomes, and many readers and reviewers may not be familiar with the framework's assumptions, there is a particular risk of 'researcher degrees of freedom' inflating the confidence in results, thereby affecting reproducibility and predictive power. To tackle these concerns, we introduce a checklist consisting of statistical best practices to promote more robust empirical applications of MCT. Our recommendations are organised into four categories: presentation and sharing of raw data, testing model assumptions and fits, managing uncertainty associated with model coefficients and incorporating this uncertainty into coexistence predictions. We surveyed empirical MCT studies published over the past 15 years and discovered a high degree of variation in the level of statistical rigour and adherence to best practices. We present case studies to illustrate the dependence of results on seemingly innocuous choices among competition model structure and error distributions, which in some cases reversed the predicted coexistence outcomes. These results demonstrate how different analytical approaches can profoundly alter the interpretation of experimental results, underscoring the importance of carefully considering and thoroughly justifying each step taken in the analysis pathway. Our checklist serves as a resource for authors and reviewers alike, providing guidance to strengthen the empirical foundation of empirical coexistence analyses. As the field of empirical MCT shifts from a descriptive, trailblazing phase to a stage of consolidation, we emphasise the need for caution when building upon the findings of earlier studies. To ensure that progress made in the field of ecological coexistence is based on robust and reliable evidence, it is crucial to subject our predictions, conclusions and generalisability to a more rigorous assessment than is currently the trend.

An experimental validation test of ecological coexistence theory to forecast extinction under rising temperatures.

Climate-mediated shifts in temperature fluctuations promote extinction risk

Live Fast, Die Young: Experimental Evidence of Population Extinction Risk due to Climate Change

Transgenerational effects impact the vulnerability of a host-parasitoid system to rising temperatures.

Thermal environment and ecological interactions modulate the importance of evolution in response to warming

Uncertain competition coefficients undermine inferences about coexistence

A Bayesian overhaul of thermal tolerance landscape models: Predicting ectotherm lethality buildup and survival amid heatwaves

To remain modern the coexistence program requires modern statistical rigour

Coexistence in spatiotemporally fluctuating environments

The importance of species interactions in eco-evolutionary community dynamics under climate change

Climate impacts on organisms, ecosystems and human societies: integrating OCLTT into a wider context

Climate change‐mediated temperature extremes and insects: From outbreaks to breakdowns

Novel physiological data needed for progress in global change ecology

Temperature variability alters the stability and thresholds for collapse of interacting species

Survive a Warming Climate: Insect Responses to Extreme High Temperatures

Cross-tolerance evolution is driven by selection on heat tolerance in Drosophila subobscura

Widespread analytical pitfalls in empirical coexistence studies and a checklist for improving their statistical robustness

Cool Shade and Not-So-cool Shade: How Habitat Loss May Accelerate Thermal Stress under Current and Future Climate

Why Insects Cannot Stand the Heat of Climate Change

Integrating within-species variation in thermal physiology into climate change ecology

Host and parasite thermal ecology jointly determine the effect of climate warming on epidemic dynamics