Modeling the relative influence of socio-demographic variables on post-acute COVID-19 quality of life

Tigist F Menkir,Barbara Citarella,Louise Sigfrid,Yash Doshi,Luis Felipe Reyes,Jose Andres Calvache,Anders Benjamin Kildal,Anders B Nygaard,Jan Cato Holter,Prasan Kumar Panda,Waasila Jassat,Laura Merson,Christl A. Donnelly,Mauricio Santillana,Caroline Buckee,Stephane Verguet,Nima S Hejazi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.21.24303099
2024-09-09
Abstract:Importance Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2, referred to as long COVID, are a globally pervasive threat. While their many clinical determinants are commonly considered, their plausible social correlates are often overlooked. Objective To compare social and clinical predictors of differences in quality of life (QoL) with long COVID. Additionally, to measure how much adjusted associations between social factors and long COVID-associated quality of life are unexplained by important clinical intermediates. Design, Setting, and Participants Data from the ISARIC long COVID multi-country prospective cohort study. Subjects from Norway, the United Kingdom (UK), and Russia, aged 16 and above, with confirmed acute SARS-CoV-2 infection reporting >= 1 long COVID-associated symptoms 1+ month following infection. Exposure The social exposures considered were educational attainment (Norway), employment status (UK and Russia), and female vs male sex (all countries). Main outcome and measures Quality of life-adjusted days, or QALDs, with long COVID. 2 Results This cohort study included a total of 3891 participants. In all three countries, educational attainment, employment status, and female sex were important predictors of long COVID QALDs. Furthermore, a majority of the estimated relationships between each of these social correlates and long COVID QALDs could not be attributed to key long COVID-predicting comorbidities. In Norway, 90% (95% CI: 77%, 100%) of the adjusted association between the top two quintiles of educational attainment and long COVID QALDs was not explained by clinical intermediates. The same was true for 86% (73%, 100%) and 93% (80%,100%) of the adjusted associations between full-time employment and long COVID QALDs in the United Kingdom (UK) and Russia. Additionally, 77% (46%,100%) and 73% (52%, 94%) of the adjusted associations between female sex and long COVID QALDs in Norway and the UK were unexplained by the clinical mediators. Conclusions and Relevance This study highlights the role of socio-economic status indicators and female sex, in line with or beyond commonly cited clinical conditions, as predictors of long COVID-associated QoL, and further reveal that other (non-clinical) mechanisms likely drive their observed relationships. Our findings point to the importance of COVID interventions which go further than an exclusive focus on comorbidity management in order to help redress inequalities in experiences with this chronic disease.
Epidemiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?