Proteomic comparison of epidemic Australian biofilm cells

Hiroki Suyama,Laurence Don Wai Luu,Ling Zhong,Mark J. Raftery,Ruiting Lan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.19.581093
2024-02-20
Abstract:causes whooping cough, a severe respiratory infectious disease. Studies have compared the currently dominant single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) cluster I (pertussis toxin promoter allele, ) and previously dominant SNP cluster II ( ) strains as planktonic cells. Since biofilm formation is linked with pathogenesis , this study compared the biofilm formation capabilities of representative strains of cluster I and cluster II. Confocal laser scanning microscopy found that the cluster I strain had a denser biofilm structure compared to the cluster II strain. Differences in protein expression of the biofilm cells were then compared using Tandem Mass Tagging (TMT) and high-resolution multiple reaction monitoring (MRM-hr). In total, 1453 proteins were identified of which 40 proteins had significant differential expression between the two strains in biofilm conditions. Of particular interest was a large increase in expression of energy metabolism proteins (cytochrome proteins PetABC and BP3650) in the cluster I strain. When the expression of these proteins was compared between 6 additional strains from each cluster, it was found that the protein expression varied between all strains. These findings suggest that there are large levels of individual proteomic diversity between strains in biofilm conditions despite the highly conserved genome of the species. Overall, this study revealed visual differences in biofilm structure between strains and highlighted strain specific variation in protein expression that dominate potential cluster specific changes that may be linked with the dominance of cluster I strains.
Microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?