Cellular mechanisms underlying beneficial versus detrimental effects of bacterial antitumor immunotherapy

Jesse Garcia Castillo,Sebastian Fernandez,Timothy Campbell,Jacob Williams,Diego Gonzalez-Ventura,Julia Ybarra,Nicole Flores Hernandez,Elina Wells,Daniel A. Portnoy,Michel DuPage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.15.580555
2024-02-20
Abstract:engineered to express tumor antigens as a cancer vaccine has yielded mixed results. Here, we utilized an attenuated strain of (Δ ) that does not express tumor antigen to explore the immunological response to itself in the context of intravenous (IV), intratumoral (IT), or a combination of IV+IT administration into tumor-bearing mice. Unexpectedly, we found that persisted in tumors of immune competent mice, regardless of the administration route. While IT alone led to the recruitment of immunosuppressive immune cells that promoted tumor growth, IV followed by IT controlled tumor growth. IV vaccination generated a pool of anti- cytotoxic CD8 T cells that killed -infected non-tumor cells to control tumor growth. Our findings reveal a differential impact of IT administration on tumor progression that depends on the presence of anti- CD8 T cells, rather than antitumor CD8 T cells, for antitumor therapeutic efficacy.
Immunology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?