Abstract:BACKGROUND: Online health community (OHC) moderators help facilitate conversations and provide information to members. However, the necessity of the moderator in helping members achieve goals by providing the support they need remains unclear, with some prior research suggesting that moderation is unnecessary or even harmful for close-knit OHCs. Similarly, members' perceptions of moderator roles are underexplored. Starting January of 2013, WebMD moderators stopped working for WebMD communities. This event provided an opportunity for us to study the perceived role of moderators in OHCs.OBJECTIVE: We examine the OHC members' perception on OHC moderators by studying their reactions toward the departure of moderators in their communities. We also analyzed the relative posting activity on OHCs before and after the departure of moderators from the communities among all members and those who discussed moderators' departures.METHODS: We applied a mixed-methods approach to study the posts of all 55 moderated WebMD communities by querying the terms relating to discussions surrounding moderators' disappearance from the WebMD community. We performed open and axial coding and affinity diagramming to thematically analyze patients' reactions to the disappeared moderators. The number of posts and poster groups (members and moderators) were analyzed over time to understand posting patterns around moderators' departure.RESULTS: Of 821 posts retrieved under 95 threads, a total of 166 open codes were generated. The codes were then grouped into 2 main themes with 6 total subthemes. First, patients attempted to understand why moderators had left and what could be done to fill the void left by the missing moderators. During these discussions, the posts revealed that patients believed that moderators played critical roles in the communities by making the communities vibrant and healthy, finding solutions, and giving medical information. Some patients felt personally attached with moderators, expressing they would cease their community participation. On the other hand, patients also indicated that moderators were not useful or sometimes even harmful for peer interactions. The overall communities' posting activity, which was already in decline, showed no significant difference before and after the moderators' departure. In fact, the overall posting activities of the communities were declining well before the moderators' departure. These declining posting activities might be the reason why WebMD removed the moderators.CONCLUSION: Compassionate moderators who provide medical expertise, control destructive member posts, and help answer questions can provide important support for patient engagement in OHCs. Moderators are in general received positively by community members and do not appear to interfere with peer interactions. Members are well aware of the possibility of misinformation spreading in OHCs. Further investigation into the attitudes of less vocal community members should be conducted.

Experiences of moderation, moderators, and moderating by online users who engage with self-harm and suicide content

The Effect of Moderation on Online Mental Health Conversations

Content Moderators’ Strategies for Coping with the Stress of Moderating Content Online

Safe Spaces or Toxic Places? Content Moderation and Social Dynamics of Online Eating Disorder Communities

Motivations and perceived harms and benefits of online communication about self-harm: An interview study with young people

Debate: How the business model of social media fuels the need for greater moderation

The steps that young people and suicide prevention professionals think the social media industry and policymakers should take to improve online safety. A nested cross-sectional study within a Delphi consensus approach

Content moderation on social media: constructing accountability in the digital space

Moderating online child sexual abuse material (CSAM): Does self-regulation work, or is greater state regulation needed?

#BeSeen: understanding young people's views of the motivation and impacts of sharing self-harm imagery online and use of their social media data for research-a UK participatory arts-led qualitative study

Lived experiences of online harm amongst marginalized and vulnerable individuals in support-seeking communities on Reddit

Personalizing Content Moderation on Social Media: User Perspectives on Moderation Choices, Interface Design, and Labor

Lessons Learned for Online Health Community Moderator Roles: A Mixed-Methods Study of Moderators Resigning From WebMD Communities

Moral judgment of objectionable online content: Reporting decisions and punishment preferences on social media

Perceived Challenges and Online Harms from Social Media Use on a Severity Continuum: A Qualitative Psychological Stakeholder Perspective

Moderation, Networks, and Anti-Social Behavior Online

Shall AI moderators be made visible? Perception of accountability and trust in moderation systems on social media platforms

Mediating and moderating variables in the prediction of self-harm in young people: A systematic review of prospective longitudinal studies

Hidden in Plain Sight: Exploring the Intersections of Mental Health, Eating Disorders, and Content Moderation on TikTok

Perspectives and Experiences of Stakeholders on Self-Disclosure of Peers in Mental Health Services

Examining the role of moral, emotional, behavioural, and personality factors in predicting online shaming