Monocyte to macrophage differentiation and changes in cellular redox homeostasis promote cell type-specific HIV latency reactivation

Alexandra Blanco,Robert A. Coronado,Neha Arun,Kelly Ma,Roy D. Dar,Collin Kieffer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.12.579955
2024-02-12
Abstract:Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) latency regulation in monocytes and macrophages can vary according to signals directing differentiation, polarization, and function. To investigate these processes, we generated an HIV latency model in THP-1 monocytes and showed differential levels of HIV reactivation among clonal populations. Monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation of HIV-infected primary human CD14+ and THP-1 cells induced HIV reactivation and showed that virus production increased concomitant with macrophage differentiation. We applied the HIV-infected THP-1 monocyte-to- macrophage (MLat) model to assess the biological mechanisms regulating HIV latency dynamics during monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation. We pinpointed PKC signaling pathway activation and Cyclin T1 upregulation as inherent differentiation mechanisms that regulate HIV latency reactivation. Macrophage polarization regulated latency, revealing pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages suppressed HIV reactivation while M2 macrophages promoted HIV reactivation. Because macrophages rely on reactive- oxygen species (ROS) to exert numerous cellular functions, we disrupted redox pathways and discovered that inhibitors of the thioredoxin (Trx) system acted as latency promoting agents (LPAs) in T-cells and monocytes, but opposingly acted as latency reversing agents (LRAs) in macrophages. We explored this mechanism with Auranofin, a clinical candidate for reducing HIV reservoirs, and demonstrated Trx reductase (TrxR) inhibition led to ROS induced NF-κB activity, which promoted HIV reactivation in macrophages, but not in T-cells and monocytes. Collectively, cell type-specific differences in HIV latency regulation could pose a barrier to HIV eradication strategies.
Microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is: how the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages and changes in cellular redox homeostasis affect the reactivation of HIV latency. Specifically, the researchers aim to understand: 1. **Whether the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages leads to the reactivation of HIV latency**: By establishing an HIV latency model from monocytes to macrophages, the researchers explored the changes in HIV latency during the differentiation process. 2. **The impact of differentiation mechanisms on the reactivation of HIV latency**: The researchers evaluated the role of protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathway activation and Cyclin T1 upregulation in the reactivation of HIV latency. 3. **The effect of macrophage polarization states on the reactivation of HIV latency**: The researchers examined how different polarization states (M1 and M2) of macrophages regulate the reactivation of HIV latency. 4. **The impact of changes in redox homeostasis on the reactivation of HIV latency**: By inhibiting the thioredoxin system (Trx system), the researchers investigated the regulatory role of cellular redox state on the reactivation of HIV latency. These studies aim to reveal the regulatory mechanisms of HIV latency in different cell types, providing a theoretical basis for developing therapeutic strategies targeting the HIV latent reservoir.