Molecular signatures of chronic antibody-mediated rejection in human liver transplants

Bastian Engel,Ahmed Alaswad,Alejandro Campos-Murguia,Martijn Zoodsma,Anne Klingbeil,Kinan Chihab,Emily A Bosselmann,Sophia Heinrich,Bjoern Hartleben,Danny D Jonigk,Murielle Verboom,Michael Hallensleben,Robert Geffers,Christine S. Falk,Sergej Ruff,Chris Lauber,Emilie Toft Skovgaard,Diana Julie Leeming,Morten Karsdal,Heiner Wedemeyer,Chengjian Xu,Elmar Jaeckel,Yang Li,Richard Taubert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302515
2024-10-16
Abstract:Background&Aims: The role of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial. Chronic ABMR (cABMR) is often subclinical and potentially missed without surveillance biopsies (svLbx) which are not established in most LT centers. Transcriptome analysis previously characterized molecular changes in T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after solid organ transplantation. We aimed to identify molecular cABMR signatures after LT for a more comprehensive understanding of cABMR. Methods: We retrospectively identified indication and svLbx from our prospective institutional biorepository (n=1207 over 12 years). We performed RNA-sequencing on liver biopsies (discovery cohort: n=71; validation cohort: n=58). Downstream analyses explored the unique and common molecular features of cABMR, clinical (clinTCMR) and subclinical TCMR (subTCMR) compared to no histological rejection (NHR). Results: Nineteen percent of LT recipients with donor-specific antibodies had cABMR. Eighty-one percent of patients with cABMR had ALT and AST ≤2x the upper limit of normal, only being recognized by svLbx. The cABMR group displayed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) uniquely enriched in fibrogenesis-, complement activation- and TNFα-signaling-related pathways. ClinTCMR showed DEGs uniquely enriched in antigen presentation-, interferon-signaling-, and T cell receptor-signaling-related pathways. Common cABMR and clinTCMR DEGs were enriched in chemokine-signaling- and cytokine response-related pathways. Gene set enrichment scores of interferon-signaling and extracellular matrix remodeling pathways discriminated cABMR and clinTCMR. Molecular signatures of clinTCMR correlated with histological TCMR-patterns. Molecular cABMR-signatures correlated with lobular graft injury and liver fibrosis scores. The validation cohort consistently showed patterns of DEGs associating cABMR with fibrogenesis- and NF-κB-signaling-related pathways and clinTCMR with interferon-signaling- and adaptive immunity-related pathways. SubTCMR was molecularly almost indistinguishable from NHR. Conclusions: We report transcriptome-unique features of cABMR that is a unique molecular identity associated with inflammation and fibrogenesis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?