Current Topics Designer DNA Nanoarchitectures
Chenxiang Lin,Yan Liu,Hao Yan
2009-01-01
Abstract:Naturally existing biological systems, from the simplest unicellular diatom to the most sophisticated organ such as the human brain, are functional self-assembled architectures. Scientists have long been dreaming about building artificial nanostructures that can mimic such elegance in nature. Structural DNA nanotechnology, which uses DNA as a blueprint and building material to organize matter with nanometer precision, represents an appealing solution to this challenge. On the basis of the knowledge of helical DNA structure and Watson-Crick base pairing rules, scientists have constructed a number of DNA nanoarchitectures with a large variety of geometries, topologies, and periodicities with considerably high yields. Modified by functional groups, those DNA nanostructures can serve as scaffolds to control the positioning of other molecular species, which opens opportunities to study intermolecular synergies, such as protein-protein interactions, as well as to build artificial multicomponent nanomachines. In this review, we summarize the principle of DNA self-assembly, describe the exciting progress of structural DNA nanotechnology in recent years, and discuss the current frontier. The central task of nanotechnology is to control motions and organize matter with nanometer precision. To achieve this, scientists have intensively investigated a large variety of materials, including inorganic materials (e.g., carbon nanotubes) (1), organic molecules (2) and biological polymers (e.g., peptides, RNA, and DNA) (3, 4), and different methods that can be sorted into so-called “bottom-up” and “top-down” approaches. Among all of the remarkable achievements made, the success of DNA self-assembly in building programmable nanopatterns attracts broad attention and holds great promise for building novel designer nanoarchitectures (4). DNA is an excellent nanoconstruction material because of its inherent merits. First, the rigorous Watson-Crick base pairing makes the hybridization between DNA strands highly predictable. Second, the structure of the B-form DNA double helix is well-understood; its diameter and helical repeat have been determined to be ∼2 and ∼3.4 nm (i.e., ∼10.5 bases), respectively, which facilitates the modeling of even the most complicated DNA nanostructures. Third, DNA possesses combined structural stiffness and flexibility. The rigid DNA double helices can be linked by relatively flexible single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to build stable motifs with desired geometry. Fourth, modern organic chemistry and molecular biology have created a rich toolbox for readily synthesizing, modifying, and replicating DNA † This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Army Research Office (ARO), and the Technology and Research Initiative Fund from Arizona State University to Y.L. and by grants from NSF, ARO, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Office of Naval Research, and the National Institutes of Health to H.Y. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hao.yan@asu.edu. Phone: (480) 727-8570. Fax: (480) 965-2747. 1 Abbreviations: ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; dsDNA, doublestranded DNA; 1D, one-dimensional; 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, threedimensional; DX, double crossover; TX, triple crossover; PX, paranemic crossovers; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; AuNP, gold nanoparticle; RCA, rolling circle amplification. Copyright 2009 by the American Chemical Society Volume 48, Number 8 March 3, 2009 10.1021/bi802324w CCC: $40.75 2009 American Chemical Society Published on Web 01/27/2009 molecules. Finally, DNA is a biocompatible material, making it suitable for the construction of multicomponent nanostructures made from heterobiomaterials. The simplest example of DNA self-assembly can be found in almost all living forms in nature: two complementary ssDNA molecules spontaneously hybridize together and form a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) molecule. This process is driven by a number of noncovalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding, base stacking, electrostatic forces, and hydrophobic interactions and strictly obeys the Watson-Crick base pairing rules. Artificially designed DNA self-assembly is utilized by molecular biologists in gene cloning. In this case, the genomic DNA of interest is extended at both ends to have ssDNA overhangs (sticky ends) complementary to the sticky ends generated by restriction enzymes on the vector; the genomic DNA can then merge into the digested vector, and the nick can be sealed by DNA ligase. However, if more complicated nanostructures are desired, one must employ branched DNA motifs to extend the DNA selfassembly into the second, or even third, dimension. Such motifs have also been found in nature: the DNA replication fork represents a three-way junction motif, and the Holliday (four-arm) junction motif exists as the central intermediate of DNA recombination. In 1982, N. Seeman first envisioned the possibility of combining branched DNA molecules bearing complementary sticky ends to construct twodimensional (2D) arrays (5). This proposal, which was later experimentally realized, is considered to be the very first stepping stone on the path leading to structural DNA nanotechnology. Figure 1a illustrates Seeman’s initial proposal of DNA selfassembly. Here, the basic building block (also known as “tile”) for the DNA 2D array is a four-arm-junction complex formed by four ssDNA molecules. In addition to the main body, sticky ends are placed at the termini of each tile with the designated base paring strategy (1 is complementary to 1′ and 2 complementary to 2′). As a result, the tiles can infinitely grow into a periodic 2D array through sticky end association. It is intuitive to imagine expanding such selfassembly to the third dimension using three-, four-, five-, or six-arm junction tiles (Figure 1b, gray tiles). This simple model also illustrates that self-assembly is a hierarchical process: the individual tile formations happen first, and the tile-tile associations follow. Consequently, Seeman proposed the potential application of self-assembled DNA nanostructures as scaffolds to regulate the positioning of other macromolecules in three dimensions. As shown in Figure 1b, the protein molecules can be assembled parallel to each other with well-defined spatial spacing, directed by the formation of a periodic 3D DNA lattice. Once realized, these lattices could provide a universal means of crystallizing macromolecules and facilitating subsequent structural determination using X-ray diffraction. DNA TILES AND PERIODIC DNA ARRAYS The past decade witnessed the fast evolution of structural DNA nanotechnology (4, 6-10). A large variety of DNA tiles with different geometries and topologies have been constructed with excellent yield. In general, the creation of a novel DNA motif usually requires the following steps. (1) In structural modeling, physical and/or graphic models are used to help in the design of a new DNA motif. These models are based on the basic knowledge of DNA helical structures (e.g., helical pitch, diameter, base stacking, phosphodiester bond length, etc.) and are built to give the designer straightforward information (e.g., size, shape, and stability) about the designed architecture. The most important consideration for the structural design is to minimize the free energy of the final DNA complex to promote spontaneous assembly. In other words, all the DNA strands involved should stay “comfortably” in the final structure (i.e., no overstretched bonds, no overbent helixes, etc.). Today, computer programs (e.g., Mfold, GIDEON, Tiamat, and Nanoengineer-1) are designed to aid modeling and free energy predictions (11-14). A complicated structure is deemed “good” or “bad” on the basis of empirical parameters, though even the most experienced designer cannot be assured of successful assembly at this stage. Fortunately, with a large and growing number of DNA nanostructures available, we are now richly equipped to design new structures by adapting, joining, or scissoring known structures. (2) For sequence design, specific sequences are assigned to all ssDNA molecules in the model. A general rule of sequence design is to minimize sequence symmetry in the branched structure to avoid possible undesired pairing between participating strands and mobility of the junction points. It is important to point out that sequence symmetry is only avoided within each individual strand but can be allowed between different strands at the symmetric positions in the same tile. The sequence designing process is now automated by computer programs such as SEQUIN (15), Tiamat (13), and Uniquimer (16). It is worth mentioning that these programs are designed to break sequence symmetry throughout the whole DNA construct. When symmetry is desired within the system, the sequence for each DNA strand should be designed separately. (3) For experimental synthesis of the DNA nanostructure, the oligonucleotides with designated sequences are synthesized by a DNA synthesizer, purified FIGURE 1: Principle and application of DNA self-assembly, as proposed by N. Seeman. (a) Principle of DNA self-assembly: combining branched DNA nanostructures with sticky ends to form 2D arrays. Arabic numbers indicate base pairing strategies between sticky ends (1 is complementary to 1′, etc.). (b) Protein crystallization templated by DNA 3D self-assembly. 1664 Biochemistry, Vol. 48, No. 8, 2009 Current Topics