Mean Dynamics Index: a useful tool to identify motor psychogenic non epileptic seizures

Raz Winer,Shahram Shlomo Shahkoohi,Moshe Herskovitz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.07.24302379
2024-02-08
Abstract:Timely and accurate diagnosis of Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) is crucial. Aside from potential diagnostic delays, patients with PNES often undergo unnecessary pharmacological or invasive treatments. Presently, effective bedside tools for distinguishing PNES from epileptic seizures (ES) remain elusive, and the ‘gold standard’ diagnosis relies primarily on patient history and prolonged video EEG monitoring. In this study, we developed a simple clinical tool - the Mean Dynamic Index (MD) - to differentiate PNES from ES. We divided the body into five anatomical regions: the head and face, two upper extremities, and two lower extremities. Due to limited movement potential, the trunk was excluded from consideration. Among these five areas, only actively involved regions were considered in the score calculation. Each distinct motor feature observed contributed a point to the regional summation, with each region’s score comprising the Regional Dynamic Index (RDI). The Mean Dynamic Index (MDI) represents the average of all RDIs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted to the VEEG monitoring unit were evaluated. Of these, 15 patients presented primarily with motor symptoms. Eight were diagnosed with PNES, while seven had epileptic seizures. The mean MDI was 1.2±0.4 in the PNES group and 2.8±0.77 in the ES group (p<0.001). The mean MDI/duration ratio was 0.31±0.38 for PNES and 3.5±2.4 for ES (p < 0.003). An MDI score of 1.665 yielded a specificity of 87.5% and sensitivity of 100% for diagnosing ES. A low MDI score (<1.66) in motor seizures indicates limited variability in the movement profile of each body part, suggesting a PNES etiology. Additionally, as the MDI/time ratio decreases, PNES becomes more likely. Furthermore, we observed that an RDI of 3 or higher completely differentiated between PNES and ES. These findings offer a valuable bedside tool for distinguishing between the two conditions.
Neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?