Abstract:A chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging (ChIA-PET) approach is used to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in several different stem-cell populations; putative long-range promoter–enhancer interactions are inferred, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection and prevalent cell-specific enhancer usage. Gene transcription requires dynamic chromatin connectivity between promoters bound by RNA polymerase II and their corresponding distal-acting enhancers. In this paper the authors use the ChIA-PET (chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging) approach to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells and neurosphere progenitor cells. Putative enhancer–promoter interactions can be inferred, and many enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection. This work illustrates the possible importance of underlying chromatin structures in nuclear function. In multicellular organisms, transcription regulation is one of the central mechanisms modelling lineage differentiation and cell-fate determination1. Transcription requires dynamic chromatin configurations between promoters and their corresponding distal regulatory elements2. It is believed that their communication occurs within large discrete foci of aggregated RNA polymerases termed transcription factories in three-dimensional nuclear space3. However, the dynamic nature of chromatin connectivity has not been characterized at the genome-wide level. Here, through a chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging approach3,4,5 using an antibody that primarily recognizes the pre-initiation complexes of RNA polymerase II6, we explore the transcriptional interactomes of three mouse cells of progressive lineage commitment, including pluripotent embryonic stem cells7, neural stem cells8 and neurosphere stem/progenitor cells9. Our global chromatin connectivity maps reveal approximately 40,000 long-range interactions, suggest precise enhancer–promoter associations and delineate cell-type-specific chromatin structures. Analysis of the complex regulatory repertoire shows that there are extensive colocalizations among promoters and distal-acting enhancers. Most of the enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that the linear juxtaposition is not the only guiding principle driving enhancer target selection. Although promoter–enhancer interactions exhibit high cell-type specificity, promoters involved in interactions are found to be generally common and mostly active among different cells. Chromatin connectivity networks reveal that the pivotal genes of reprogramming functions are transcribed within physical proximity to each other in embryonic stem cells, linking chromatin architecture to coordinated gene expression. Our study sets the stage for the full-scale dissection of spatial and temporal genome structures and their roles in orchestrating development.

Dissecting the dynamics of coordinated active transcriptional repression in a multicellular organism

Single-cell Multi-Scale Footprinting Reveals the Modular Organization of DNA Regulatory Elements

Optogenetic dissection of transcriptional repression in a multicellular organism

Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context

Temporal constraints on enhancer usage shape the regulation of limb gene transcription

Dynamical Analysis on Gene Activity in the Presence of Repressors and an Interfering Promoter

Chromatin topology dynamics in gene activation

Developmental Effector Gene Regulation: Multiplexed Strategies for Functional Analysis

Independence of chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning

Live-cell imaging of RNA Pol II and elongation factors distinguishes competing mechanisms of transcription regulation

Retrospective analysis of enhancer activity and transcriptome history

Mutual Repression Enhances the Steepness and Precision of Gene Expression Boundaries

Ezh1 and Ezh2 Maintain Repressive Chromatin Through Different Mechanisms

Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila

Nonequilibrium model of short-range repression in gene transcription regulation

Interactome Maps of Mouse Gene Regulatory Domains Reveal Basic Principles of Transcriptional Regulation.

Single-cell multi-omic analysis reveals principles of transcription-chromatin interaction during embryogenesis

Transcription start site profiling uncovers divergent transcription and enhancer-associated RNAs in Drosophila melanogaster

Proximal termination generates a transcriptional state that determines the rate of establishment of Polycomb silencing

Dynamic regulation of histone modifications and long-range chromosomal interactions during postmitotic transcriptional reactivation

Chromatin Connectivity Maps Reveal Dynamic Promoter–enhancer Long-Range Associations