Socioeconomic correlates of urban mobility trends in two Australian cities during transitional periods of the COVID-19 pandemic

Pratyush Kollepara,Subhrasankha Dey,Martin Tomko,Erika Martino,Rebecca Bentley,Michele Tizzoni,Nicholas Geard,Cameron Zachreson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.31.24302105

2024-02-03

Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, both government-mandated lockdowns and discretionary changes in behaviour combined to produce dramatic and abrupt changes to human mobility patterns. To understand the socioeconomic determinants of intervention compliance and discretionary behavioural responses to epidemic threats, we investigate whether changes in human mobility showed a systematic variation with socioeconomic status during two distinct periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. We analyse mobility data from two major urban centres and compare the trends during mandated stay-at-home policies and after the full relaxation of NPIs, which coincided with a large surge of COVID-19 cases. We analyse data aggregated from de-identified GPS trajectories, collated from providers of mobile phone applications and aggregated to small spatial regions. Our results demonstrate systematic decreases in mobility relative to pre-pandemic baseline with the Index of Education and Occupation, for both pandemic periods. On the other hand, the Index of Economic Resources was not correlated with mobility changes. This result contrasts with observations from other national contexts, where reductions in mobility typically increased strongly with indicators of wealth. We interpret these findings in the context of the economic policies put in place by Australian authorities to subsidise household incomes and maintain the essential workforce.

Epidemiology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether the population mobility changes in two major Australian cities (Sydney and Melbourne) are related to socioeconomic status during the COVID - 19 pandemic. Specifically, the study aims to explore how socioeconomic factors affect people's travel behavior during two different stages of the pandemic (during the stay - at - home order in April 2020 and after the full lifting of non - pharmaceutical interventions in January 2022).

### Research Background
1. **Pandemic Background**:
- At the end of March 2020, Victoria and New South Wales in Australia began to implement stay - at - home orders to control the spread of COVID - 19.
- In January 2022, with the emergence of the Omicron variant and the relaxation of restrictions, there was a large - scale surge in cases in these two states.

2. **Research Motivation**:
- Understanding how socioeconomic factors affect people's compliance with epidemic prevention policies and autonomous behavior changes is crucial for formulating fair and effective public health policies.
- Previous studies have shown that there are different relationships between mobility changes and socioeconomic status during the pandemic in different countries and regions, but these research results are not consistent.

### Research Methods
1. **Data Sources**:
- Use de - identified GPS trajectory data provided by Pathzz. These data are collected from mobile application providers and aggregated into small spatial areas.
- The data cover September 15 - October 15, 2019 (baseline period), April 2020 (during the stay - at - home order), and January 2022 (during the Omicron wave).

2. **Analysis Methods**:
- Represent the mobility change in each Statistical Area 1 (SA1) as the transformation of the logarithmic ratio of the number of visitors in the test period to that in the baseline period:
\[
\lambda_{\text{mob}}(\text{SA1})=\ln\left(\frac{A_{\text{SA1}}}{B_{\text{SA1}}}\right)
\]
where,
\[
A_{\text{SA1}}=\frac{\sum_{\text{DZN}} V(\text{SA1}\to\text{DZN}, T_{\text{test}})}{C(\text{SA1}, T_{\text{test}})}
\]
\[
B_{\text{SA1}}=\frac{\sum_{\text{DZN}} V(\text{SA1}\to\text{DZN}, T_{\text{base}})}{C(\text{SA1}, T_{\text{base}})}
\]

3. **Socioeconomic Index**:
- Use the Socio - Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, especially the Education and Occupation Index (EO) and the Economic Resources Index (ER).
- The EO index reflects the education level and occupational skills, and the ER index reflects income, rent, and housing ownership.

### Main Findings
1. **Overall Mobility Trends**:
- During the implementation of the stay - at - home order, the median mobility in the two cities decreased significantly, but the magnitude of change varied greatly among different regions.
- During the reopening in January 2022, despite the surge in cases, the median mobility in Melbourne decreased slightly, while the median mobility in Sydney did not change significantly.

2. **Influence of Socioeconomic Factors**:
- In both cities, the Education and Occupation Index (EO) is negatively correlated with mobility change, that is, areas with higher education and occupational levels have a greater reduction in mobility.
- The Economic Resources Index (ER) has no significant correlation with mobility change.

### Conclusion
This study reveals that during the Australian pandemic, areas with higher education and occupational levels are more inclined to reduce outdoor activities, while the economic resource level has little impact on mobility change. This finding helps to understand the behavioral differences of different socioeconomic groups in the face of the pandemic and provides a basis for formulating more accurate and fair public health policies.