Triple-drug therapy with ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and albendazole for the acceleration of lymphatic filariasis elimination in Kenya: Programmatic implementation and results of the first impact surveillance

Sammy M. Njenga,Henry Kanyi,Collins Okoyo,Edward Githinji,Cassian Mwatele,Hadley S. Matendechero,Wyckliff P. Omondi,Patrick N. Gitahi,Chrispin Owaga,Joyce K. Onsongo,Katherine Gass
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.30.24301765
2024-01-30
Abstract:The World Health Organization (WHO) endorsed the use of triple-drug mass drug administration (MDA) regimen with ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole (commonly abbreviated as IDA) to accelerate the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) as a public health problem in settings where onchocerciasis is not co-endemic. The National Programme for Elimination of LF (NPELF) in Kenya was among the first adopters of the IDA-MDA and two annual rounds were provided in 2018 and 2019 to the residents of Lamu County and Jomvu sub-County in the coast region. There is a need to determine efficient sampling strategies, indicators, and the appropriate population groups that could be used for the monitoring and evaluation of LF programs using IDA-MDA for the elimination of the disease as a public health problem. Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted at baseline in 2018 before IDA-MDA and an impact assessment 17 months after the second round of IDA-MDA. The reported epidemiological treatment coverage was at least 80% in all implementation units during each round of IDA-MDA. Blood samples were tested for circulating filarial antigens using commercial Filariasis Test Strips (FTS) and any individual that was found to be positive was tested again at night for the presence of microfilariae in finger prick blood smears using microscopy. The overall prevalence of LF infection was relatively low at the baseline survey with Jomvu having 1.39% (95% CI: 0.91, 2.11) and Lamu having 0.48% (95% CI: 0.21, 1.13). Significant reductions in LF prevalence were observed during the impact assessment after two annual rounds of treatment. The overall relative risk reduction (%) in LF prevalence following the two rounds of MDA with IDA was significant in both Jomvu (52.45%, Z = –2.46, P < 0.02) and Lamu (52.71%, Z = –1.97, P < 0.05). Heterogeneity, however, was observed in the LF prevalence reduction between random and purposive clusters, as well as between adult and child populations. The results of the endline impact survey offered strong evidence that it was safe to stop the IDA-MDA in the two EUs because transmission appears to have been interrupted. It is also important to implement a post-treatment surveillance system which would enable efficient detection of any recrudescence of LF infection transmission at a sub-evaluation unit level. Our findings show that IDA-MDA may be considered for acceleration of LF elimination in other settings where onchocerciasis is not co-endemic.
Public and Global Health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?