Abstract:Female gametogenesis in requires both differentiation of germline stem cells and the unique cell cycle meiosis. Successful segregation of chromosomes into gametes during meiosis requires the formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes. The frequency and distribution of crossovers is highly regulated at several levels, including formation of at least one obligate crossover per pair of homologs, crossover interference that keeps crossovers farther apart than expected by chance, and suppression of crossovers in and near the centromere. To achieve crossover patterning, a meiosis specific version of homologous recombination is used to repair programmed double-stranded breaks, and in , this recombination pathway requires the putative double Holliday junction resolvase MEI-9. Despite our understanding of crossover patterning mechanisms at the phenomenological level, how crossover patterning mechanisms are developmentally controlled in the context of germ cell differentiation is unknown. Here, we take advantage of a hypomorphic mutation in a gene previously associated with regulation of both germ cell mitoses and meiotic induction. We confirm that mutants show extended expression of mitotic cell cycle markers but rarely completely block differentiation, indicating that the mitotic cell cycle is mis-regulated. In this developmentally delayed context, we show that mutants enter meiosis and complete the earliest stages of prophase, including loading of synaptonemal complex proteins onto the centromere and initial loading onto the arms. Most nuclei do not progress past this to make full length synaptonemal complex, yet meiotic double-strand breaks are induced and crossovers form. However, while these crossovers require MEI-9 and exhibit crossover assurance, the centromere effect and interference are lost. We suggest a model where entry into zygotene of prophase is enough to commit pro-oocytes to using the meiotic homologous recombination machinery and thus ensuring crossover assurance, but that full length synaptonemal complex assembly is required for crossover interference.

Crossover Interference Mediates Multiscale Patterning Along Meiotic Chromosomes

Topoisomerase II mediates meiotic crossover interference

Crossover patterns under meiotic chromosome program

Meiotic chromosome organization and crossover patterns<SUP>?</SUP>

Interference Length reveals regularity of crossover placement across species

Temporal and Functional Relationship between Synaptonemal Complex Morphogenesis and Recombination during Meiosis

Per-Nucleus Crossover Covariation and Implications for Evolution

Crossovers are regulated by a conserved and disordered synaptonemal complex domain

Negative Supercoils Regulate Meiotic Crossover Patterns in Budding Yeast

Analysis of a hypomorphic mei-P26 mutation reveals developmental control of CO patterning mechanisms

Patterns of crossover distribution in Drosophila mauritiana necessitate a re-thinking of the centromere effect on crossing over

Length-sensitive partitioning of meiotic chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans senses proximity and number of crossover sites

Recurrent loss of crossover interference punctuates the recombination landscape across yeast species

Centromere pairing enables correct segregation of meiotic chromosomes

Maximizing meiotic crossover rate reveals the map of Crossover Potential

Synaptonemal complex protects double-Holliday junctions during meiosis

Crossover Interference, Crossover Maturation, and Human Aneuploidy.

Suppression of meiotic crossovers in pericentromeric heterochromatin requires synaptonemal complex and meiotic recombination factors in Drosophila melanogaster

ASY3 has dosage-dependent diverse effects on meiotic crossover formation

Interplay between Pds5 and Rec8 in regulating chromosome axis length and crossover frequency

Temperature Regulates Negative Supercoils to Modulate Meiotic Crossovers and Chromosome Organization