Analyzing the intrastate and interstate swine movement network in the United States

Nicolas C. Cardenas,Arthur Valencio,Felipe Sanchez,Kathleen C. O’Hara,Gustavo Machado

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.25.576551

2024-01-29

Abstract:Disease prevention and control tactics rely on identifying and restricting animal movement to attenuate the between-premises spread of disease in livestock systems. Therefore, it is essential to uncover between-premises movement dynamics, including shipment distances and network-based control strategies. Here, we analyzed three years of between-premises pig movements, which include 197,022 unique animal shipments, 3,973 premises, and 391,625,374 pigs shipped across 20 U.S. states. We constructed unweighted, directed, temporal networks at 180-day intervals to calculate premises-to-premises movement distances, the size of connected components, network loyalty, and degree distributions, and, based on the out-going contact chains, identified network-based control actions. Our results show that the median distance between premises pig movements was 74.37 km, with median intrastate and interstate movements of 52.71 km and 328.76 km, respectively. On average, 2,842 premises were connected via 6,705 edges, resulting in a weak giant connected component that included 91% of the premises. The premises-level network exhibited loyalty, with a median of 0.65 (IQR: 0.45 – 0.77). Results highlight the effectiveness of node targeting and disease spread; we demonstrated that targeting 25% of farms with the highest degree or betweenness limited spread to 1.23% and 1.7% of premises, respectively. While there is no complete shipment data for the entire U.S., our multi-state movement analysis demonstrated the value and the needs of such data for enhancing the design and implementation of proactive-disease control tactics.

Ecology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve

This paper aims to address the issue of analyzing intra-state and inter-state movement patterns within the U.S. swine transportation network. Specifically:

1. **Data Scarcity and Disease Control**:
- There is currently a lack of a centralized electronic system to capture and monitor swine transportation records, making it difficult to analyze swine movement patterns nationwide.
- To better prepare for disease outbreaks, researchers need a deep understanding of the actual swine contact network and to develop effective response strategies.

2. **Swine Transportation Network Analysis**:
- Researchers collected multi-state animal transportation data from six swine production companies and conducted large-scale network analysis.
- The data covered 3,973 locations and the transportation of 391,625,374 pigs across 20 states.
- The analysis included metrics such as intra-state and inter-state transportation distances, connected component sizes, network loyalty, and degree distribution.

3. **Disease Spread Control Strategies**:
- By identifying key nodes in the network (such as farms with high degree or betweenness centrality), the study found that targeting these nodes can significantly limit disease spread.
- The results indicate that targeting the 25% of farms with the highest degree or betweenness centrality can limit disease spread to 1.23% and 1.7% of locations, respectively.

In summary, this paper aims to reveal intra-state and inter-state transportation patterns through the analysis of the swine transportation network and propose effective disease control strategies.