The genetic consequences of population marginality: a case study in maritime pine

Adelaide Theraroz,Carlos Guadano-Peyrot,Juliette Archambeau,Sara Pinosio,Francesca Bagnoli,Andrea Piotti,Camilla Avanzi,Giovanni Giuseppe Vendramin,Ricardo Alia,Delphine Grivet,Marjana Westergren,Santiago Cesar Gonzalez-Martinez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.27.573436

2024-06-22

Abstract:Marginal tree populations, either those located at the edges of the species range or in suboptimal environments, are often a valuable genetic resource for biological conservation. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the genetic consequences of population marginality, estimated across entire species ranges. Our study addresses this gap by providing information about several genetic indicators and their variability in marginal and core populations identified using quantitative marginality indices.

Genetics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is understanding the genetic consequences of edge populations (populations located at the edge of a species' distribution range or in suboptimal environments). Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the characteristics of edge populations in terms of genetic diversity, inbreeding, genetic differentiation, recessive genetic load, and genomic offset by analyzing genomic data of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.), and to explore the relationship between these characteristics and geographical, ecological, and historical marginality. The goal of the study is to test the Central-Peripheral Hypothesis (CPH), which posits that edge populations generally have lower genetic diversity and higher genetic differentiation, and may be more maladapted to future climate changes.

### Main Research Content:
1. **Genetic Diversity**: The study examined overall genetic diversity as well as genetic diversity based on different types of outlier loci.
2. **Inbreeding**: The level of inbreeding in the populations was assessed.
3. **Genetic Differentiation**: The degree of genetic differentiation among populations was analyzed.
4. **Recessive Genetic Load**: The accumulation of predicted deleterious mutations in the populations was calculated.
5. **Genomic Offset**: The adaptability of populations to future climate conditions was evaluated.

### Research Methods:
- **Sample Collection**: Needle samples were collected from 1,510 individuals across 82 maritime pine populations.
- **Genomic Analysis**: Genotyping was performed using 10,185 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
- **Marginality Indices**: Multiple quantitative marginality indices were calculated, including geographical marginality, ecological marginality, and historical marginality.
- **Genetic Indices Calculation**: Genetic indices such as genetic diversity, inbreeding, genetic differentiation, recessive genetic load, and genomic offset were calculated.
- **Statistical Modeling**: Linear mixed models were used to analyze the relationship between marginality indices and genetic indices.

### Research Conclusions:
- **Genetic Diversity**: Overall genetic diversity in edge populations showed a declining trend, but genetic diversity based on outlier loci did not show significant changes.
- **Genetic Differentiation**: Genetic differentiation in edge populations increased, supporting the Central-Peripheral Hypothesis.
- **Inbreeding**: No significant correlation was found between marginality and inbreeding.
- **Recessive Genetic Load**: Geographical edge populations had lower recessive genetic load, while ecological edge populations had higher genomic offset, indicating poorer adaptability to future climate conditions.
- **Adaptation Risk**: Overall, edge populations may be more susceptible to climate change than core populations, despite having lower genetic load.

This study provides important insights into the genetic characteristics of edge populations and their potential vulnerability to climate change, contributing to biodiversity conservation and forest resource management.