Abstract:Predicting how new mutations alter phenotypes is difficult because mutational effects vary across genotypes and environments. Recently discovered global epistasis, where the fitness effects of mutations scale with the fitness of the background genotype, can improve predictions, but how the environment modulates this scaling is unknown. We measured the fitness effects of ~100 insertion mutations in 42 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in six laboratory environments and found that the global-epistasis scaling is nearly invariant across environments. Instead, the environment tunes one global parameter, the background fitness at which most mutations switch sign. As a consequence, the distribution of mutational effects is predictable across genotypes and environments. Our results suggest that the effective dimensionality of genotype-to-phenotype maps across environments is surprisingly low.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand how the pattern of the influence of mutations on the microbial growth rate remains consistent in different environments. Specifically, the researchers focused on whether global epistasis exhibits consistent patterns under different environmental conditions. By measuring the fitness effects of approximately 100 insertion mutations in 42 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and conducting experiments in six laboratory environments, the paper found that the fitness effects of these mutations follow a global epistasis pattern that is almost unaffected by the environment. However, the environment does regulate a global parameter, namely the background fitness level at which most mutations change signs. This finding indicates that the distribution of mutation effects can be predicted between genotypes and environments, thereby simplifying the effective dimensions of the genotype - to - phenotype mapping. ### Main problems 1. **Predictability of mutation effects**: The researchers hoped to understand whether the influence of mutations on the microbial growth rate can be predicted through a certain pattern, especially under different genetic backgrounds and environmental conditions. 2. **Environmental dependence of global epistasis**: The researchers explored whether global epistasis remains consistent in different environments and how the environment regulates this effect. 3. **Pattern of mutation effect distribution**: The researchers attempted to understand whether the distribution pattern of mutation effects can be predicted in different genotypes and environments. ### Research methods - **Experimental design**: The researchers selected 42 strains of yeast. These strains are from the hybrid offspring of two different strains and have a wide range of genetic differences. - **Environmental conditions**: The experiments were carried out under six different environmental conditions, including different temperatures (30 °C and 37 °C) and pH values (3.2, 5.0 and 7.0). - **Data collection**: The growth rate changes of each mutation in different background strains and environments were measured through barcode competition experiments. - **Data analysis**: A linear model was used to analyze the relationship between mutation effects and background growth rates to verify the existence of global epistasis and its environmental dependence. ### Main findings 1. **Diversity of mutation effects**: Most mutations can be either beneficial or harmful in different genotypes and environments, and there are no unconditionally beneficial or harmful mutations. 2. **Consistency of global epistasis**: There is a linear relationship between the fitness effects of mutations and the background growth rate, and this relationship remains consistent in different environments. 3. **Environment - regulated parameters**: The environment mainly affects the distribution of mutation effects by regulating a global parameter - the background growth rate, rather than changing the slope of global epistasis. ### Conclusion The research results show that the distribution pattern of mutation effects is predictable in different genotypes and environments, which provides a simplified framework for genotype - to - phenotype mapping. This finding is of great significance for understanding evolutionary dynamics, predicting mutation effects, and studying gene - environment interactions.

Environment-independent distribution of mutational effects emerges from microscopic epistasis

Environment-independent distribution of mutational effects emerges from microscopic epistasis

Plasticity and environment-specific relationships between gene expression and fitness in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Global epistasis on fitness landscapes

Plasticity and environment-specific relationships between gene expression and fitness in

Mutations in yeast are deleterious on average regardless of the degree of adaptation to the testing environment

Dynamic Epistasis under Varying Environmental Perturbations

Epistasis decreases with increasing antibiotic pressure but not temperature

Changing fitness effects of mutations through long-term bacterial evolution

Spontaneous single-nucleotide substitutions and microsatellite mutations have distinct distributions of fitness effects

Unpredictability of the fitness effects of antimicrobial resistance mutations across environments in Escherichia coli

Dynamics and variability in the pleiotropic effects of adaptation in laboratory budding yeast populations

Environment-dependent epistasis increases phenotypic diversity in gene regulatory networks

An uncertainty law for microbial evolution

Discovering Genetic Modulators of the Protein Homeostasis System through Multilevel Analysis

The dynamics of adaptation to stress from standing genetic variation and de novo mutations

Variations and predictability of epistasis on an intragenic fitness landscape.

Alternative mutational architectures producing identical M-matrices can lead to different patterns of evolutionary divergence

Analysis of epistatic interactions and fitness landscapes using a new geometric approach

How microscopic epistasis and clonal interference shape the fitness trajectory in a spin glass model of microbial long-term evolution