Abstract:Animals play a key role in biomedical research and other areas of scientific inquiry. But public opinion plays a key role in influencing how this area of science is regulated and funded. Nevertheless, scientists have historically been reticent to speak openly about their animal research or to open their animal facilities to the public in any way. Consequently, most of the available information has come from those opposed to animal research. This imbalance has led to suspicion and lagging public support for this work. To reverse this effect, efforts are now being made in many parts of the world to increase openness and transparency in this sector. The authors firmly believe that encouraging more institutions to join this movement, focused on better and greater communication, is essential to preserve the research community's "permission" to perform justifiable studies involving animals. For the purposes of this article, we consider "the public" to include that cross-section of society who may be asked their views in opinion poll studies and who may vote in elections. It also includes other influential groups such as the media, scientists working in other disciplines, animal welfare groups, and politicians who may shape regulatory frameworks. Public opinion on this issue matters. The majority of funding for biomedical research comes, either directly or indirectly, from the public purse. In the case of pharmaceutical research, funding derives from selling medicines to consumers. We therefore all have a vested interest in this funding. Furthermore, legislation that covers the use of animals in research is permissive-it allows scientists to do things that might otherwise contravene animal welfare laws. But this permission is normally contingent on complying with strict protective measures designed to ensure the work stays within the ethical framework that public opinion has deemed appropriate. Open and transparent communication is the best way to promote public understanding. There is thus a responsibility on all those involved in animal research, whether scientists, animal care staff, physicians, veterinarians, members of ethics committees, or managers and leaders, to support and promote public awareness and trust in this work. Circumstantial evidence shows that, with such open dialogue, there is decreased targeting and harassment of individuals and job pride and satisfaction for all involved is improved.

Communicating information about the psychology of a wild carnivore, the red fox, influences perceived attitudinal changes but not overall tolerance in people

The role of information presentation for wildlife knowledge, attitude, and risk perception

Changing the Tolerance of the Intolerant: Does Large Carnivore Policy Matter?

Emotionalization in Science Communication: The Impact of Narratives and Visual Representations on Knowledge Gain and Risk Perception

More than a feeling: Cognitive beliefs and positive—but not negative—affect predict overall attitudes toward predators

Urban fox squirrels exhibit tolerance to humans but respond to stimuli from natural predators

Limitations of current knowledge about the ecology of Grey Foxes hamper conservation efforts

Applying Reiss' expectancy theory to locals' perceptions of a potential red wolf reintroduction to Ozark National Forest, AR

Students' Attitudes to and Knowledge of Brown Bears (Ursus arctos L.): Can More Knowledge Reduce Fear and Assist in Conservation Efforts?

The wildlife attitude-acceptability framework's potential to inform human dimensions of wildlife science and practice

The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions

Human Positioning in Close-Encounter Photographs and the Effect on Public Perceptions of Zoo Animals

The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human-carnivore coexistence

Personality influences habituation behaviour in ungulates

Communicating About Animal Research with the Public

Predictors of carnivore tolerance among census-designated and self-identified rural and urban residents in Idaho, USA

Sensory integration of danger and safety cues may explain the fear of a quiet coyote

The expression profile of genes associated with behavior, stress, and adult neurogenesis along the hippocampal dorsoventral axis in tame and aggressive foxes

Wildlife values can inform strategic conservation communication efforts

Prey responses to foxes are not determined by nativeness

Exploring the efficacy of identity priming and message framing in influencing American attitudes toward trophy hunting