Methionine oxidation of Carbohydrate-Active enZymes during white-rot wood decay

Lise Molinelli,Elodie Drula,Jean-Charles Gaillard,David Navarro,Jean Armengaud,Jean-Guy Berrin,Thierry Tron,Lionel Tarrago
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.24.563746
2024-01-08
Abstract:White-rot fungi employ secreted carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) along with reactive oxygen species (ROS), like hydrogen peroxide (H O ), to degrade lignocellulose in wood. H O serves as a co-substrate for key oxidoreductases during the initial decay phase. While the degradation of lignocellulose by CAZymes is well-documented, the impact of ROS on the oxidation of the secreted proteins remains unclear and the identity of the oxidized proteins is unknown. Methionine (Met) can be oxidized to Met sulfoxide (MetO) or Met sulfone (MetO ) with potential deleterious, antioxidant, or regulatory effects. Other residues, like proline (Pro), can undergo carbonylation. Using the white-rot grown on aspen wood, we analyzed the Met content of the secreted proteins and their susceptibility to oxidation combining H O with deep shotgun proteomics. Strikingly, their overall Met content was significantly lower (1.4%) compared to intracellular proteins (2.1%), a feature conserved in fungi but not in metazoans or plants. We evidenced that a catalase, widespread in white-rot fungi, protects the secreted proteins from oxidation. Our redox proteomics approach allowed identification of 49 oxidizable Met and 40 oxidizable Pro residues within few secreted proteins, mostly CAZymes. Interestingly, many of them had several oxidized residues localized in hotspots. Some Met, including those in GH7 cellobiohydrolases, were oxidized up to 47%, with a substantial percentage of sulfone (13%). These Met are conserved in fungal homologs, suggesting important functional roles. Our findings reveal that white-rot fungi safeguard their secreted proteins by minimizing their Met content and by scavenging ROS and pinpoint redox-active residues in CAZymes.
Microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?