Mapping axon diameters and conduction velocity in the rat brain – different methods tell different stories of the structure-function relationship

Christian S. Skoven,Mariam Andersson,Marco Pizzolato,Hartwig R. Siebner,Tim B. Dyrby
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.20.558833
2024-01-17
Abstract:The structure-function relationship of nerve fibers describes an empirically determined linear relationship between axon diameter, myelin thickness (i.e., g-ratio), and conduction velocity. We investigated the structure-function relationship with different modalities in axons projecting through the corpus callosum of the rodent brain. We measured transcallosal conduction times using optogenetically evoked local field potentials (LFP) and estimated conduction velocity after measuring the callosal length with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) based tractography. Tractography followed the same projection as the fluorescently labeled axons in the corpus callosum. In the same animal, axon diameters were quantified using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dMRI. Axon distributions of TEM indicated a bimodal population, where the larger axons shrink more than the smaller ones, when comparing the modes with cryo-TEM. When applying shrinkage-correction to axon diameters from TEM of dehydrated tissue, they were better aligned with estimates from dMRI obtained in the same animal. Measured LFPs predicted axon diameters that agree with the primary mode of the axon distribution, whereas the large axons estimated by dMRI predicted latencies too short to be measured by LFPs. Different modalities show different degrees of variations, being low between animals, suggesting that the variation is methodologically dominated - not anatomically. Our results show that modalities have different sensitivity profiles to the whole axon diameter distribution. Therefore, caution must be taken when interpreting a method’s prediction of a metric, as it may not represent the full but only a sub-part of the structure-function relationship of an axonal projection.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the structure-function relationship of brain nerve fibers, particularly the relationship between axon diameter, myelin sheath thickness (i.e., g-ratio), and conduction velocity. Specifically, the researchers evaluate the diameter and conduction velocity of axons in the rat corpus callosum using different measurement methods, including electrophysiology, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM). ### Main Research Questions 1. **Sensitivity of Different Modalities**: Different imaging techniques have varying sensitivities to different parts of the axon diameter distribution. For example, dMRI is mainly sensitive to larger diameter axons, while TEM and Cryo-EM can better reflect smaller diameter axons. 2. **Validation of Structure-Function Relationship**: Whether the transcallosal conduction time (TCT) measured by electrophysiology can match the conduction velocity predicted by structural measurements. 3. **Impact of Tissue Processing**: How tissue shrinkage introduced during traditional resin-embedded electron microscopy sample preparation affects axon diameter measurements, and whether cryo-fixation techniques can reduce this impact. ### Research Background - **Theoretical Basis**: Rushton et al. proposed a theory describing the linear relationship between axon diameter, myelin sheath thickness, and conduction velocity. The g-ratio (the ratio of axon diameter to myelin sheath thickness) is relatively constant in the central nervous system. - **Axon Diameter Distribution**: The distribution of axon diameters varies among different brain white matter tracts and is related to the connected brain regions. For example, the axon diameter distribution in the corpus callosum typically shows a bimodal distribution, with larger axons associated with motor and sensory areas. - **Imaging Techniques**: dMRI can non-invasively estimate axon diameter, but its results may be limited by hardware and imaging protocols. TEM and Cryo-EM can provide more precise axon diameter measurements but require invasive tissue processing. ### Research Methods - **Electrophysiological Measurements**: Using optogenetic stimulation of the rat motor cortex, recording local field potentials (LFP) in the contralateral motor cortex to measure transcallosal conduction time. - **dMRI Measurements**: Using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging-based fiber tracking techniques to measure the path length of the corpus callosum and estimate axon diameter. - **TEM and Cryo-EM Measurements**: Examining the corpus callosum of the same animal using transmission electron microscopy and cryo-electron microscopy to quantify axon diameter and g-ratio. ### Results - **Relationship Between Conduction Time and Axon Diameter**: The conduction time measured by electrophysiology corresponds to a subgroup of smaller diameter axons, whose diameters are close to the distribution patterns measured by TEM and Cryo-EM. - **Sensitivity of Different Modalities**: dMRI is more sensitive to larger diameter axons, while TEM and Cryo-EM can better reflect smaller diameter axons. There is no simple relationship between the diameters estimated by dMRI and the conduction time measured by electrophysiology. - **Impact of Tissue Processing**: Tissue shrinkage introduced during traditional resin-embedded electron microscopy sample preparation leads to smaller measured axon diameters, while cryo-fixation techniques can reduce this impact. ### Conclusion - **Sensitivity of Different Modalities**: Different imaging techniques have varying sensitivities to different parts of the axon diameter distribution, which should be considered when interpreting results. - **Complexity of Structure-Function Relationship**: The conduction time measured by electrophysiology mainly reflects a subgroup of smaller diameter axons, while dMRI reflects larger diameter axons. This indicates that multiple imaging techniques should be integrated when studying the structure-function relationship of nerve fibers. ### Significance This study emphasizes the sensitivity and limitations of different imaging techniques in evaluating the structure-function relationship of nerve fibers. This is important for understanding brain function and developing new neuroimaging technologies.