Abstract:Intracellular bodies such as nucleoli, Cajal bodies and various signalling assemblies represent membraneless organelles, or condensates, that form via liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS)1,2. Biomolecular interactions—particularly homotypic interactions mediated by self-associating intrinsically disordered protein regions—are thought to underlie the thermodynamic driving forces for LLPS, forming condensates that can facilitate the assembly and processing of biochemically active complexes, such as ribosomal subunits within the nucleolus. Simplified model systems3–6 have led to the concept that a single fixed saturation concentration is a defining feature of endogenous LLPS7–9, and has been suggested as a mechanism for intracellular concentration buffering2,7,8,10. However, the assumption of a fixed saturation concentration remains largely untested within living cells, in which the richly multicomponent nature of condensates could complicate this simple picture. Here we show that heterotypic multicomponent interactions dominate endogenous LLPS, and give rise to nucleoli and other condensates that do not exhibit a fixed saturation concentration. As the concentration of individual components is varied, their partition coefficients change in a manner that can be used to determine the thermodynamic free energies that underlie LLPS. We find that heterotypic interactions among protein and RNA components stabilize various archetypal intracellular condensates—including the nucleolus, Cajal bodies, stress granules and P-bodies—implying that the composition of condensates is finely tuned by the thermodynamics of the underlying biomolecular interaction network. In the context of RNA-processing condensates such as the nucleolus, this manifests in the selective exclusion of fully assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes, providing a thermodynamic basis for vectorial ribosomal RNA flux out of the nucleolus. This methodology is conceptually straightforward and readily implemented, and can be broadly used to extract thermodynamic parameters from microscopy images. These approaches pave the way for a deeper understanding of the thermodynamics of multicomponent intracellular phase behaviour and its interplay with the nonequilibrium activity that is characteristic of endogenous condensates. Heterotypic multicomponent interactions are shown to dominate the liquid–liquid phase separation that enables the formation of intracellular condensates.

Visualizing liquid-liquid phase transitions

RNA-driven phase transitions in biomolecular condensates

Charge-Driven Condensation of RNA and Proteins Suggests Broad Role of Phase Separation in Cytoplasmic Environments

The disordered P granule protein LAF-1 drives phase separation into droplets with tunable viscosity and dynamics

Phase behaviour of hnRNPA1 low-complexity domain mutants described by different sequence-dependent models

Reentrant liquid condensate phase of proteins is stabilized by hydrophobic and non-ionic interactions

Nucleoprotein Phase-Separation Affinities Revealed via Atomistic Simulations of Short Peptide and RNA Fragments

Specific protein-RNA interactions are mostly preserved in biomolecular condensates

RNA contributions to the form and function of biomolecular condensates

Composition-dependent thermodynamics of intracellular phase separation

Protein-RNA condensation kinetics via filamentous nanoclusters

Temperature-induced changes in protein interactions control RNA recruitment to G3BP1 condensates

Liquid–liquid Phase Separation in Diseases

Protein Network Structure Enables Switching between Liquid and Gel States

Drops in the Cell Ocean: New Roles for Non-Coding RNAs in Liquid–liquid Phase Separation

Detecting protein-protein interaction during liquid-liquid phase separation using fluorogenic protein sensors

Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of Patchy Particles Illuminates Diverse Effects of Regulatory Components on Protein Droplet Formation

RNA and liquid-liquid phase separation

Phase separation in biology and disease—a symposium report