Abstract:Chromatin regulators are a group of proteins that can alter the physical properties of chromatin to make it more or less permissive to transcription by modulating another protein’s access to a specific DNA sequence through changes in nucleosome occupancy or histone modifications at a particular locus. Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes (mSWI/SNF) are a group of ATPase-dependent chromatin remodelers that alter chromatin states. In mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), there are three primary forms of mSWI/SNF: canonical BAF (cBAF), polybromo-associated BAF (pBAF), and GLTSCR-associated BAF (gBAF or ncBAF). While cBAF and gBAF contain the SS18 protein subunit, pBAF lacks SS18. Previous studies used a novel dCas9-mediated inducible recruitment (FIRE-Cas9) of mSWI/SNF complexes via SS18 to the locus. is a developmentally regulated gene that requires mSWI/SNF for transcriptional activation during neural differentiation. However, in mESCs, is bivalent, meaning nucleosomes at the locus have both active and polycomb-associated repressive modifications. Upon recruitment of SS18-containing complexes, polycomb-associated histone marks are removed, followed by transcriptional activation of . However, since both cBAF and gBAF share the SS18 subunit, it is unclear whether one or both complexes oppose the polycomb repressive marks. The ability of pBAF to do the same also remains unknown. In this study, we used unique subunits to recruit each of the three complexes to the Nkx2.9 locus individually. Here, we show that cBAF most effectively opposes polycomb repressive marks at , leading to transcriptional activation of the gene. Recruitment of cBAF complexes leads to a significant loss of the polycomb repressive-2 H3K27me3 and polycomb repressive-1 H2AK119ub histone marks, whereas gBAF and pBAF do not. Moreover, nucleosome occupancy alone cannot explain the loss of these marks. Our results demonstrate that cBAF has a unique role in the direct opposition of polycomb-associated histone modifications that gBAF and pBAF do not share.

Differential Modulation of Polycomb-Associated Histone Marks by cBAF, pBAF, and gBAF Complexes

Differential modulation of polycomb-associated histone marks by cBAF, pBAF, and gBAF complexes

Kdm2b Maintains Murine Embryonic Stem Cell Status by Recruiting PRC1 Complex to CpG Islands of Developmental Genes

Identification of H3K4me1-associated Proteins at Mammalian Enhancers

Distinct Roles of GCN5/PCAF-mediated H3K9ac and CBP/p300-mediated H3K18/27ac in Nuclear Receptor Transactivation.

The role of the polybromo-associated BAF complex in development

MGA, L3MBTL2 and E2F6 determine genomic binding of the non-canonical Polycomb repressive complex PRC1.6

A conserved BAH module within mammalian BAHD1 connects H3K27me3 to Polycomb gene silencing

H2A.Z.1 Monoubiquitylation Antagonizes BRD2 to Maintain Poised Chromatin in ESCs

Sparse CBX2 nucleates many Polycomb proteins to promote facultative heterochromatinization of Polycomb target genes

Differential contribution of p300 and CBP to regulatory element acetylation in mESCs

CBP-mediated acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 antagonizes Drosophila Polycomb silencing

PRC1 and CTCF-Mediated Transition from Poised to Active Chromatin Loops Drives Bivalent Gene Activation

Ezh1 and Ezh2 Maintain Repressive Chromatin Through Different Mechanisms

The SWI/SNF PBAF complex facilitates REST occupancy at repressive chromatin

H2AK119ub1 Differentially Fine-Tunes Gene Expression by Modulating Canonical PRC1- and H1-dependent Chromatin Compaction

Developmental Control of Polycomb Subunit Composition by GATA Factors Mediates a Switch to Non-Canonical Functions.

Requisite Chromatin Remodeling for Myeloid and Erythroid Lineage Differentiation from Erythromyeloid Progenitors

Histone H3.3 lysine 9 and 27 control repressive chromatin at cryptic enhancers and bivalent promoters

Mammalian cells contain two functionally distinct PBAF complexes incorporating different isoforms of PHF10 signature subunit