Abstract:New protein-coding genes can evolve from previously non-coding genomic regions through a process known as de novo gene emergence. Evidence suggests that this process has likely occurred throughout evolution and across the tree of life. Yet, confidently identifying de novo emerged genes remains challenging. Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction (ASR) is a promising approach for inferring whether a gene has emerged de novo or not, as it can enable us to inspect whether a given genomic locus ancestrally harbored protein-coding capacity. However, the use of ASR in the context of de novo emergence is still in its infancy and its capabilities, limitations, and overall potential are largely unknown. Notably, it is difficult to formally evaluate the protein-coding capacity of ancestral sequences, particularly when new gene candidates are short. How well-suited is ASR as a tool for the detection and study of de novo genes? Here, we address this question by designing an ASR workflow incorporating different tools and sets of parameters and by introducing a formal criterion that allows to estimate, within a desired level of confidence, when protein-coding capacity originated at a particular locus. Applying this workflow on ∼2,600 short, annotated budding yeast genes (<1,000 nucleotides), we found that ASR robustly predicts an ancient origin for most widely conserved genes, which constitute “easy” cases. For less robust cases, we calculated a randomization-based empirical P-value estimating whether the observed conservation between the extant and ancestral reading frame could be attributed to chance. This formal criterion allowed us to pinpoint a branch of origin for most of the less robust cases, identifying 33 genes that can unequivocally be considered de novo originated since the split of the genus, including 20 -specific genes. We find that the remaining, equivocal cases, may be explained by different evolutionary scenarios including rapid evolution and multiple losses, as well as a very recent de novo origin. Overall, our findings suggest that ASR is a valuable tool to study de novo gene emergence but should be applied with caution and awareness of its limitations.

How antisense transcripts can evolve to encode novel proteins

ORFs are more likely to shrink than to elongate during neutral evolution

Translation of neutrally evolving peptides provides a basis for de novo gene evolution

Alternative transcripts recode human genes to express overlapping, frameshifted microproteins

Overlapping Genes Produce Proteins with Unusual Sequence Properties and Offer Insight into De Novo Protein Creation

De Novo Origination of a New Protein-Coding Gene in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Alternative Processing as Evolutionary Mechanism for the Origin of Novel Nonprotein Coding RNAs

A-to-I Editing Sites Are a Genomically Encoded G: Implications for the Evolutionary Significance and Identification of Novel Editing Sites

Origin And Evolution Of New Exons In Rodents

Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction as a tool to detect and study de novo gene emergence

The Expanding Roles of Argonautes: RNA Interference, Splicing and Beyond

Origin of New Genes: Evidence from Experimental and Computational Analyses

Long non-coding RNAs as a source of new peptides

On Primordial Sense–Antisense Coding

A putative scenario of how de novo protein-coding genes originate in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae lineage

Upstream open reading frames may contain hundreds of novel human exons

Natural antisense transcripts as versatile regulators of gene expression

Evolution of tRNA pool shapes variation in selection on codon usage across the Saccharomycotina subphylu

Expression of Random Sequences and de novo Evolved Genes From the Mouse in Human Cells Reveals Functional Diversity and Specificity

Genetic and selective constraints on the optimization of gene product diversity

Translation and natural selection of micropeptides from long non-canonical RNAs