Tick-borne zoonotic flaviviruses and infections in wildlife hosts: what have field studies contributed?

Armelle Poisson,Thierry Boulinier,Laure Bournez,Gaëlle Gonzalez,Camille V. Migné,Sara Moutailler,Bruno Faivre,Raphaëlle Métras

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.25.554822

2024-02-14

Abstract:Tick-borne flaviviruses and spp. are globally spread pathogens of zoonotic potential that are maintained by a transmission cycle at the interface between ticks and vertebrate hosts, mainly wild animals. Aside data on pathogen burden in ticks, information on the status of various hosts relative to infection could be critical. We reviewed how those infections have been studied in wildlife species in the field to discuss how collected data provided relevant epidemiological information and identify needs for further studies. The literature was screened for populational studies on direct or antibody detection for tick-borne spp. and flaviviruses in animals, in the wild. Overall, spp. were more studied (73% of case studies, representing 297 host species) than flaviviruses (27% of case studies, representing 114 host species). Studies on both spp. and flaviviruses focused mainly on the same species, namely bank vole and yellow-necked mouse. Most studies were order-specific and cross-sectional, reporting prevalence at various locations, but with little insight into the underlying epidemiological dynamics. Species with potential to act as reservoir hosts were overlooked, notably passerine birds. We highlight the necessity of collecting both demographics and infection data in wildlife studies, and to consider communities of species, to better estimate zoonotic risk potential in the One Health context.

Ecology