Abstract:Abstract Background Predicting survival of recipients after liver transplantation is regarded as one of the most important challenges in contemporary medicine. Hence, improving on current prediction models is of great interest.Nowadays, there is a strong discussion in the medical field about machine learning (ML) and whether it has greater potential than traditional regression models when dealing with complex data. Criticism to ML is related to unsuitable performance measures and lack of interpretability which is important for clinicians. Methods In this paper, ML techniques such as random forests and neural networks are applied to large data of 62294 patients from the United States with 97 predictors selected on clinical/statistical grounds, over more than 600, to predict survival from transplantation. Of particular interest is also the identification of potential risk factors. A comparison is performed between 3 different Cox models (with all variables, backward selection and LASSO) and 3 machine learning techniques: a random survival forest and 2 partial logistic artificial neural networks (PLANNs). For PLANNs, novel extensions to their original specification are tested. Emphasis is given on the advantages and pitfalls of each method and on the interpretability of the ML techniques. Results Well-established predictive measures are employed from the survival field (C-index, Brier score and Integrated Brier Score) and the strongest prognostic factors are identified for each model. Clinical endpoint is overall graft-survival defined as the time between transplantation and the date of graft-failure or death. The random survival forest shows slightly better predictive performance than Cox models based on the C-index. Neural networks show better performance than both Cox models and random survival forest based on the Integrated Brier Score at 10 years. Conclusion In this work, it is shown that machine learning techniques can be a useful tool for both prediction and interpretation in the survival context. From the ML techniques examined here, PLANN with 1 hidden layer predicts survival probabilities the most accurately, being as calibrated as the Cox model with all variables. Trial registration Retrospective data were provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients under Data Use Agreement number 9477 for analysis of risk factors after liver transplantation.

Predicting graft and patient outcomes following kidney transplantation using interpretable machine learning models

A Statistical Prediction Model for Survival after Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors

Predicting Kidney Graft Survival Using Machine Learning Methods: Prediction Model Development and Feature Significance Analysis Study

Predicting kidney allograft survival with explainable machine learning

Using Information Available at the Time of Donor Offer to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Prediction Models

Improving Deceased Donor Kidney Utilization: Predicting Risk of Nonuse with Interpretable Models

Enhanced survival prediction using explainable artificial intelligence in heart transplantation

Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation

Live-donor kidney transplant outcome prediction (L-TOP) using artificial intelligence

A predictive model for kidney transplant graft survival using machine learning

Predicting prognostic factors in kidney transplantation using a machine learning approach to enhance outcome predictions: a retrospective cohort study

Predicting graft survival in paediatric kidney transplant recipients using machine learning

Ensemble of machine learning techniques to predict survival in kidney transplant recipients

Survival prediction models since liver transplantation - comparisons between Cox models and machine learning techniques

Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation

A machine learning approach towards assessing consistency and reproducibility: an application to graft survival across three kidney transplantation eras

Competing and Noncompeting Risk Models for Predicting Kidney Allograft Failure

Decision Support System for Renal Transplantation

Comparison of artificial intelligence and human-based prediction and stratification of the risk of long-term kidney allograft failure

Predicting kidney transplant survival using multiple feature representations for HLAs

Advancing Kidney Transplantation: A Machine Learning Approach to Enhance Donor–Recipient Matching