Can higher aggressiveness effectively compensate for a virulence deficiency in plant pathogen? A case study of ’s fitness evolution in a diversified varietal landscape

Cécilia Fontyn,Kevin JG Meyer,Anne-Lise Boixel,Corentin Picard,Adrien Destanque,Thierry C Marcel,Frédéric Suffert,Henriette Goyeau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.09.544363

2024-02-24

Abstract:Plant resistances impose strong selective pressure on plant pathogen populations through the deployment of resistance genes, which leads to the emergence of new virulences. The pathogen adaptation also involves other parasitic fitness traits, especially aggressiveness components. A previous study on Puccinia triticina, the causal agent of wheat leaf rust, revealed that the distribution frequency of virulences in the French pathogen population cannot be fully explained by the major resistance genes deployed in the landscape. From 2012 to 2015, two dominant pathotypes (distinguished by their combination of virulences) were equally frequent despite the theoretical advantage conferred to one pathotype (166 317 0) by its virulence to Lr3, frequent in the cultivated landscape, whereas the other (106 314 0) is avirulent to this gene. To explain this apparent contradiction, we assessed three components of aggressiveness — infection efficiency, latency period and sporulation capacity — for 23 isolates representative of the most frequent genotype within each pathotype (106 314 0-G2 and 166 317 0-G1, identified by their combination of microsatellite markers). We tested these isolates on seedlings of Michigan Amber, a ‘naive’ wheat cultivar that has never been grown in the landscape, Apache, a ’neutral‘ cultivar with no selection effect on the landscape-pathotype pattern, and several cultivars that were frequently grown. We found that 106 314 0-G2 was more aggressive than 166 317 0-G1, with a consistency for the three components of aggressiveness. Our results show that aggressiveness plays a significant role in driving evolution in pathogen populations by acting as a selective advantage, even offsetting the disadvantage of lacking virulence towards a major Lr gene. Higher aggressiveness represents a competitive advantage that is likely even more pronounced when exhibited at the landscape scale as the expression of its multiple components is amplified by the polycyclic nature of epidemics.

Plant Biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in Puccinia triticina, can higher aggressiveness effectively compensate for its lack of virulence? Specifically, the researchers observed that between 2012 and 2015, the two main Puccinia triticina strain types (106 314 0 and 166 317 0) had similar distribution frequencies in France. Although theoretically, carrying the virulence to the Lr3 gene (166 317 0) should give this strain type an advantage because Lr3 is widely present in the growing area. However, the 106 314 0 strain type does not carry this virulence, but its frequency has not decreased significantly as a result. This has piqued the researchers' curiosity, and they speculate that the 106 314 0 strain type may compensate for its lack of virulence through higher aggressiveness.

To test this hypothesis, the researchers evaluated three aggressiveness components of 23 isolates representing the most common genotypes in these two strain types: infection efficiency (IE), latent period (LP), and spore - producing ability (SP). These isolates were tested on "neutral" and "naive" wheat varieties, as well as on several frequently planted wheat varieties. The research results show that the aggressiveness of 106 314 0 - G2 is indeed higher than that of 166 317 0 - G1, especially more obvious in terms of latent period and spore - producing ability. This indicates that even in the absence of virulence to the major resistance gene Lr3, higher aggressiveness can be a selective advantage and may even be more significant on a landscape scale because the performance of its multiple aggressiveness components will be amplified by the multi - cycle nature of the epidemic.