Dissecting genetic correlation and pleiotropy through a genetic cross

Haoran Cai,Kerry Geiler-Samerotte,David L Des Marais

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.12.540583

2024-07-11

Abstract:Genetic correlation represents an important class of evolutionary constraint, which is itself evolvable. Empirical studies have found mixed results on whether genetic correlations change rapidly or slowly. This uncertainty challenges our ability to predict the outcome of selection. Despite the tremendous diversity and complexity of life forms, there are certain forms of life that are never observed. This might be because of developmental biases that restrict how organisms can evolve, or because they have low fitness in any environment yet available on Earth. Given that both developmental bias and selection can generate similar phenotypes, it is difficult to distinguish between the two causes of evolutionary stasis among related taxa. For example, remarkably invariant traits are observed spanning million years, such as wing shape in wherein qualitative differences are rare within genera. Here, we ask whether the absence of certain combinations of traits, as indicated by genetic correlation, reflects developmental bias. However, much confusion and controversy remain over definitions of developmental bias, and probing it is challenging. We thus present a novel approach aiming to dissect genetic correlations and estimate the relative contribution of developmental bias in maintaining genetic correlations. We do so by leveraging a common but under-utilized type of data: genetic crosses. Through empirical analyses, we find that our approach can distinguish whether genetically correlated traits are developmentally constrained to covary. We also find that our developmental bias metric is an indicator of genetic correlation stability across conditions. Our framework presents a feasible way to dissect the mechanisms underlying genetic correlation and pleiotropy.

Genetics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the mechanism of genetic correlation and its stability. Specifically, the authors hope to distinguish whether genetic correlation is caused by developmental bias or natural selection by analyzing genetic cross - data. Through this method, they hope to evaluate the stability of genetic correlation under different environmental conditions and further understand how these correlations are maintained. The main contribution of the paper lies in providing a new method to dissect genetic correlation and pleiotropy, thereby deepening the understanding of the prediction of evolutionary trajectories.

### Analysis of the Core Problems in the Paper

1. **Definition and Importance of Genetic Correlation**:
- Genetic correlation refers to the degree to which genetic variations among different traits are shared. This correlation can limit the ability of traits to evolve independently, thus affecting future evolutionary trajectories.
- Genetic correlation itself is evolvable, but its rate of change and mechanism are still unclear, which poses a challenge to predicting the results of selection.

2. **Differences between Developmental Bias and Natural Selection**:
- Developmental bias refers to the tendency of a biological system to produce certain specific phenotypic variations when perturbed (such as by mutation or environmental change). This bias may be due to the intrinsic properties of the organism, energy limitations, or physical laws.
- Natural selection may maintain genetic correlation through pleiotropy or linkage disequilibrium.

3. **Research Methods**:
- The authors use genetic cross - data to evaluate the contributions of developmental bias and natural selection to genetic correlation. By analyzing the data of recombinant inbred lines (RIL), they can estimate the genetic correlation between different traits and evaluate the stability of these correlations.
- They define a new index - horizontal pleiotropy (HP) - to describe whether the influence of a gene locus on two traits is consistent with the influence of other gene loci. If the consistency is high, it is considered developmental bias; if there are significant outliers, it is considered horizontal pleiotropy.

4. **Main Findings**:
- The authors find that developmental bias (rD) can be used as an indicator of the stability of genetic correlation (rG). Specifically, the higher the rD, the smaller the change of rG under different environmental conditions.
- They also find that genetic correlations driven by developmental bias usually have a highly polygenic structure, which makes them more stable.
- By applying their method, the authors successfully identify gene loci with high - level horizontal pleiotropy in the yeast morphology dataset and verify that these loci are consistent with the findings in previous studies.

### Conclusion

This paper provides a new perspective for understanding the mechanism of genetic correlation and its stability by proposing a new method to dissect genetic correlation and pleiotropy. This method not only helps to explain why certain trait combinations remain unchanged during the evolutionary process but also provides a theoretical basis for predicting the long - term divergence of trait evolution.