Abstract:Integrated analysis of human gene expression data from multiple studies has become essential in genomics research for complex traits. However, integrating data generated from different cohorts with different platforms, such as microarray and RNA-seq, often requires data preprocessing, including normalization. In this study, we empirically evaluate 9 commonly used cross-platform normalization methods. We classify these methods into two main types: joint and separate normalization. Joint methods normalize multiple datasets together, while separate methods normalize each dataset independently. We further divide these methods into unsupervised and supervised approaches depending on whether they use outcomes during their normalization process. Examples of joint unsupervised methods include Quantile Normalization (QN), while Rank-in serves as an example of a joint supervised method. Training Distribution Matching (TDM) is an example of a separate unsupervised method. We assess each method's ability to cluster samples, predict outcomes, and detect differentially expressed (DE) genes using three real datasets and simulated data. First, our real data analysis suggests that while joint supervised methods can cluster sample groups better than the other two method groups, they double use the outcome data with artificially inflated clustering performance. Their biases are further demonstrated by their inflated type I error in DE analysis and clustering results from simulated data with no DE genes. Second, for outcome prediction, supervised normalization is no longer applicable. Among the unsupervised methods, QN significantly outperforms the other approaches, regardless of whether RNA-seq data is used to predict microarray outcomes or vice versa. Finally, we compare normalization methods on downstream DE analysis using simulation. In addition to direct DE analysis on the combined normalized data using the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test, we also perform a meta-analysis that combines p-values of the DE analysis from each individual data. For DE analysis, the meta-analysis consistently achieves the best balance between controlling type I error and maximizing power for DE gene detection. Our research suggests that while normalization is critical for the integrated analysis of transcriptomics data, simple QN is the most efficient and unbiased normalization approach for outcome prediction, and meta-analysis is the most appropriate for DE analysis.

Feature selection followed by a novel residuals-based normalization simplifies and improves single-cell gene expression analysis

Feature selection followed by a novel residuals-based normalization that includes variance stabilization simplifies and improves single-cell gene expression analysis

Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression

Improving the Diversity of Captured Full-Length Isoforms Using a Normalized Single-Molecule RNA-sequencing Method

Feature selection and dimension reduction for single-cell RNA-Seq based on a multinomial model

Normalization of Single-cell RNA-seq Data Using Partial Least Squares with Adaptive Fuzzy Weight

Non-linear Normalization for Non-UMI Single Cell RNA-Seq

bayNorm: Bayesian gene expression recovery, imputation and normalization for single-cell RNA-sequencing data

Statistically principled feature selection for single cell transcriptomics

Feature-specific quantile normalization and feature-specific mean–variance normalization deliver robust bi-directional classification and feature selection performance between microarray and RNAseq data

Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data

scKWARN: Kernel-weighted-average robust normalization for single-cell RNA-seq data

BASiCS workflow: a step-by-step analysis of expression variability using single cell RNA sequencing data

A statistical normalization method and differential expression analysis for RNA-seq data between different species

Normalizing need not be the norm: count-based math for analyzing single-cell data

Comprehensive Evaluation of Noise Reduction Methods for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data

Data normalization for addressing the challenges in the analysis of single-cell transcriptomic datasets

Optimization and Redevelopment of Single-Cell Data Analysis Workflow Based on Deep Generative Models

DUBStepR: correlation-based feature selection for clustering single-cell RNA sequencing data

Evaluating Cross-Platform Normalization Methods for Integrated Microarray and RNA-seq Data Analysis