Cancer Prevalence Across Vertebrates

Zachary T. Compton,Walker Mellon,Valerie Harris,Shawn Rupp,Diego Mallo,Stefania E. Kapsetaki,Mallory Wilmot,Ryan Kennington,Kathleen Noble,Cristina Baciu,Lucia Ramirez,Ashley Peraza,Brian Martins,Sushil Sudhakar,Selin Aksoy,Gabriela Furukawa,Orsolya Vincze,Mathieu Giraudeau,Elizabeth G. Duke,Simon Spiro,Edmund Flach,Hannah Davidson,Christopher Li,Ashley Zehnder,Trevor A. Graham,Brigid Troan,Tara M. Harrison,Marc Tollis,Joshua D. Schiffman,Athena Aktipis,Lisa M. Abegglen,Carlo C. Maley,Amy M. Boddy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.15.527881
2024-04-22
Abstract:Cancer is pervasive across multicellular species, but what explains differences in cancer prevalence across species? Using 16,049 necropsy records for 292 species spanning three clades (amphibians, sauropsids and mammals) we found that neoplasia and malignancy prevalence increases with adult weight (contrary to Peto’s Paradox) and somatic mutation rate, but decreases with gestation time. Evolution of cancer susceptibility appears to have undergone sudden shifts followed by stabilizing selection. Outliers for neoplasia prevalence include the common porpoise (<1.3%), the Rodrigues fruit bat (<1.6%) the black-footed penguin (<0.4%), ferrets (63%) and opossums (35%). Discovering why some species have particularly high or low levels of cancer may lead to a better understanding of cancer syndromes and novel strategies for the management and prevention of cancer.
Cancer Biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: **Differences in cancer incidence rates among different species and the reasons behind them**. Specifically, the researchers used 16,049 veterinary autopsy records, covering 292 species of animals (including amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals), to explore the following main issues: 1. **Prevalence of cancer in different species**: - The researchers hope to understand whether there are significant differences in the incidence of cancer among different species and whether these differences are related to certain biological characteristics. 2. **Verification of Peto's paradox**: - Peto's paradox states that large, long - lived animals should be more likely to develop cancer than small, short - lived animals because they have more cells and a longer life cycle, which increases the likelihood of cancer occurrence. However, this is not the case in actual observations. The researchers hope to verify whether this paradox holds through large - scale data analysis. 3. **Biological factors affecting cancer incidence**: - The researchers explored the effects of various biological factors on cancer incidence, including adult body weight, lifespan, gestation time, DNA damage response, and somatic mutation rate, etc. They hope to find the key factors affecting cancer incidence through these analyses. 4. **Exploration of evolutionary mechanisms**: - The researchers also hope to explore the evolutionary mechanisms of cancer susceptibility and resistance by comparing the cancer incidence rates of different species. This helps to understand why certain species have particularly high or low cancer incidence rates and may provide new ideas for the prevention and treatment of human cancer. In summary, this paper aims to reveal the differences in cancer incidence rates among different species and the underlying biological and evolutionary mechanisms through large - scale data analysis, thereby providing new perspectives and methods for cancer research.