Neuroticism/negative emotionality is associated with increased reactivity to uncertain threat in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, not the amygdala

Shannon Elizabeth Grogans,Juyoen Hur,Matthew G Barstead,Allegra S Anderson,Samiha Islam,Hyung Cho Kim,Manuel Kuhn,Rachael M Tillman,Andrew S Fox,Jason F Smith,Kathryn A DeYoung,Alexander J Shackman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.09.527767

2024-06-01

Abstract:Neuroticism/Negative Emotionality (N/NE)-the tendency to experience anxiety, fear, and other negative emotions-is a fundamental dimension of temperament with profound consequences for health, wealth, and wellbeing. Elevated N/NE is associated with a panoply of adverse outcomes, from reduced socioeconomic attainment to psychiatric illness. Animal research suggests that N/NE reflects heightened reactivity to uncertain threat in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST) and central nucleus of the amygdala (Ce), but the relevance of these discoveries to humans has remained unclear. Here we used a novel combination of psychometric, psychophysiological, and neuroimaging approaches to rigorously test this hypothesis in an ethnoracially diverse, sex-balanced sample of 220 emerging adults selectively recruited to encompass a broad spectrum of N/NE. Cross-validated robust-regression analyses demonstrated that N/NE is preferentially associated with heightened BST activation during the uncertain anticipation of a genuinely distressing threat (aversive multimodal stimulation), whereas N/NE was unrelated to BST activation during certain-threat anticipation, Ce activation during either type of threat anticipation, or BST/Ce reactivity to threat-related faces. It is often assumed that different threat paradigms are interchangeable assays of individual differences in brain function, yet this has rarely been tested. Our results revealed negligible associations between BST/Ce reactivity to the anticipation of threat and the presentation of threat-related faces, indicating that the two tasks are non-fungible. These observations provide a framework for conceptualizing emotional traits and disorders; for guiding the design and interpretation of biobank and other neuroimaging studies of psychiatric risk, disease, and treatment; and for informing mechanistic research.

Neuroscience

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is the exploration of the relationship between Neuroticism or Negative Emotionality and the response of the extended amygdala in the brain, particularly the activation of the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis (BNST) under uncertain threat. Specifically, the researchers aim to test the following hypotheses:

1. **Neuroticism and BNST Activation**: Whether individuals with higher levels of neuroticism exhibit greater BNST activation when facing uncertain threats.
2. **Consistency Across Different Threat Paradigms**: Whether different types of threat tasks (such as the anticipation of uncertain threats and the presentation of threat-related faces) can interchangeably reflect individual differences in brain function.

To test these hypotheses, the researchers designed a novel, multimodal threat anticipation paradigm and combined psychological measurements, physiological measurements, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology. This was tested in a racially diverse, gender-balanced sample of 220 young adults. Through this approach, the researchers hope to more accurately understand the relationship between neuroticism and activity in specific brain regions, thereby providing new perspectives for mental health research and treatment.