Abstract:Predatory publishing is an exploitative fraudulent open-access publishing model that applies charges under the pretense of legitimate publishing operations without actually providing the editorial services associated with legitimate journals. The aim of this study was to analyze this phenomenon in the field of anesthesiology and related specialties (intensive care, critical and respiratory medicine, pain medicine, and emergency care). Two authors independently surveyed a freely accessible, constantly updated version of the original Beall lists of potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers and standalone journals. We identified 212 journals from 83 publishers, and the total number of published articles was 12,871. The reported location of most publishers was in the United States. In 43% of cases (37/84), the reported location was judged as ‚Äúunreliable‚Äù after being checked using the 3-dimensional view in Google Maps. Six journals were indexed in PubMed. Although 6 journals were declared to be indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, none were actually registered. The median article processing charge was 634.5 US dollars (interquartile range, 275‚Äì1005 US dollars). Several journals reported false indexing/registration in the Committee on Publication Ethics and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors registries and Google Scholar. Only 32% (67/212) reported the name of the editor-in-chief. Rules for ethics/scientific misconduct were reported in only 24% of cases (50/212). In conclusion, potential or probable predatory open-access publishers and journals are widely present in the broad field of anesthesiology and related specialties. Researchers should carefully check journals‚Äô reported information, including location, editorial board, indexing, and rules for ethics when submitting their manuscripts to open-access journals.

Correction: Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall's list by the scientific community–A bibliometric big data study

Corrigendum for “A Novel Kinase Subverts Aluminium Resistance by Boosting Ornithine Decarboxylase‐dependent Putrescine Biosynthesis”

Correction: Link prediction based on spectral analysis

Errors and secret data in the Italian research assessment exercise. A comment to a reply

Correction: Fehlhofer et al. Expression of Inflammatory Mediators in Biofilm Samples and Clinical Association in Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Remission—A Pilot Study. Life 2024, 14, 367

Erratum: Zerebellärer Schwindel, was steckt dahinter?

Correction To: Basiliximab Versus Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin As Induction Therapy for Living-Related Renal Transplantation: a Single-Center Experience

Author Correction: BHMT Polymorphism and Susceptibility to PTE in Chinese Patients.

Correction: Patient education materials for non-specific low back pain and sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Erratum to "From goal to outcome: Analyzing the progression of biomedical sciences PhD careers in a longitudinal study using an expanded taxonomy"

Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology

Erratum: Interbacterial predation as a strategy for DNA acquisition in naturally competent bacteria

Erratum: Editorial: Towards a new 3Rs era in experimental research

Correction: (Not) part of the team: Racial empathy bias in a South African minimal group study

Erratum to "Investigating the association between dietary patterns and glycemic control among children and adolescents with T1DM"

Correction: The role of artificial photo backgrounds of shelter dogs on pet profile clicking and the perception of sociability

Correction: Managing institutional conflicts: Stakeholder accounts of communication between conflict of interest and technology transfer offices

Correction: Assessing the consistency of iPSC and animal models in cystic fibrosis modelling: A meta-analysis

Correction: The longitudinal association between patient empowerment and patient-reported outcomes: What is the direction of effect?

Erratum: Developing PRISM: A Pragmatic Institutional Survey and Bench Marking Tool to Measure Digital Research Maturity of Cancer Centers

Error in Funding/Support