Intranasal self-amplifying RNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine produces protective respiratory and systemic immunity and prevents viral transmission

Madeleine F. Jennewein,Michael D. Schultz,Samuel Beaver,Peter Battisti,Julie Bakken,Derek Hanson,Jobaida Akther,Fen Zhou,Raodoh Mohamath,Jasneet Singh,Noah Cross,Darshan N. Kasal,Matthew Ykema,Sierra Reed,Davies Kalange,Isabella R. Cheatwood,Jennifer L. Tipper,Jeremy B. Foote,R. Glenn King,Kevin S Harrod,Aaron Silva-Sanchez,Davide Botta,Alana Gerhardt,Corey Casper,Troy D. Randall,Frances E. Lund,Emily A. Voigt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.10.515993
2024-10-16
Abstract:While mRNA vaccines have been effective in combating SARS-CoV-2, waning of vaccine-induced antibody responses and lack of vaccine-induced respiratory tract immunity contribute to ongoing infection and transmission. In this work, we compare and contrast intranasal (i.n.) and intramuscular (i.m.) administration of a SARS-CoV-2 self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccine delivered by a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC). Both i.m. and i.n. vaccines induce potent systemic serum neutralizing antibodies, bone marrow-resident IgG-secreting cells, and splenic T cell responses. The i.n. vaccine additionally induces robust respiratory mucosal immune responses, including SARS-CoV-2-reactive lung-resident memory and lung-homing T cell populations. As a booster following previous i.m. vaccination, the i.n. vaccine also elicits the development of mucosal virus-specific T cells. Both the i.m. and i.n. administered vaccines durably protect hamsters from infection-associated morbidity upon viral challenge, significantly reducing viral loads and preventing challenged hamsters from transmitting virus to naive cagemates. This saRNA-NLC vaccine's potent systemic immunogenicity, and additional mucosal immunogenicity when delivered i.n., may be key for combating SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens.
Immunology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?