Sex differences in social synchronization of conditioned fear

Wataru Ito,Alexei Morozov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.10.511569
2024-04-02
Abstract:Socially coordinated threat responses support the survival of social groups, and the distinct social roles of males and females predict sex differences in such coordination. However, this study area remains unexplored in mice, the most commonly used laboratory species. Here, we examined two behaviors: a recently reported ‘fear synchrony,’ where paired mice synchronize auditory-conditioned freezing more strongly in males, and a newly identified ‘CS-induced affiliation,’ where mice increase proximity upon a conditioned stimulus. These behaviors necessitate the integration of social cues with emotional CS. To understand how sex influences that process, we manipulated social cues through partner familiarity and emotional states via prior stress. Unfamiliarity moderately reduced synchrony in male dyads but not in females. Whereas stress disrupted male synchrony and contrarily enhanced female synchrony. Unfamiliarity eliminated CS-induced affiliation in both sexes, while stress caused males to distance each other but had no effects in females. Interestingly, heterosexual dyads showed resilience in both coordinated behaviors unaffected by stress or unfamiliarity. These findings reveal sex-specific adaptations in socio-emotional integration when orchestrating socially coordinated behaviors and suggest that the sex-recognition circuits confer stress- and unfamiliarity-resilience, in particular, in heterosexual dyads.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly explores how gender differences in mice affect social synchronization of conditioned fear responses. The researchers observed two behaviors: one is "fear synchronization," in which paired mice freeze in a more synchronized manner when exposed to auditory stimuli, which is more evident in males; the other is the newly identified "CS-induced affinity," in which mice increase their proximity to each other after receiving conditioned stimuli. They manipulated social cues by changing the familiarity and emotional state of partners and found that unfamiliarity decreased the synchronization of male dyads but had no effect on females. Stress disrupted synchronization in males but enhanced synchronization in females. Heterosexual dyads exhibited resilience in both coordination behaviors and were unaffected by stress or unfamiliarity. The study also revealed gender-specific adaptations in integrating social and emotional information processing, particularly in heterosexual dyads, which may be related to gender recognition circuits, enabling them to have stronger adaptability in stressful and unfamiliar environments. Furthermore, the study found that conditioned stimuli can promote social affinity, but stress alters male behavior from affinity to dispersion. CS-induced affinity is associated with fear synchronization in males but not in females. In summary, the paper aims to understand how gender influences the integration of social coordination and defensive behaviors and the biological mechanisms behind gender differences in responding to threats.