Abstract:It has long been recognized that avian mass loss during breeding could be adaptive, though many studies still commonly interpret mass loss as evidence of "stress" or a cost of reproduction. Here, we used a long‐term dataset from a breeding population of European starlings to investigate the ecological and/or life‐history contexts under which mass loss may be viewed as a "cost" or an adaptive strategy and, specifically, test whether mass loss during chick rearing represents a phenotypically plastic trait that varies predictably in relation to ecological context and individual quality. Overall, we found no support for the idea that mass loss reflects "reproductive stress" in our system and instead suggest that mass loss may represent an individually plastic trait that individuals use to "level the playing field" and individually optimize reproductive effort and fitness. It has long been recognized that mass loss during breeding could be adaptive (e.g., by ameliorating the costs of increased parental activity). However, many studies still commonly interpret mass loss as evidence of "stress" or a cost of reproduction (i.e., a negative effect of high workload during chick provisioning). Despite several studies reporting evidence in support of both hypotheses, the ecological and/or life‐history contexts under which mass loss may be viewed as a "cost" or an adaptive strategy are still unclear. Here, we used a long‐term dataset from a breeding population of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to investigate natural annual and individual variation in body mass and mass loss and to test whether mass loss during chick rearing represents a phenotypically plastic trait that varies predictably in relation to ecological context and individual quality. While there was significant annual variation in incubation mass, chick‐rearing mass, and mass change, there were no systematic relationships between mass loss and current breeding success or future fecundity and survival. In addition, we found no evidence of intra‐annual repeatability of mass loss between first and second broods ( = .00) but moderate interannual repeatability of mass loss (R = .61) during first broods, suggesting differences in mass loss under different selective pressures. However, we found no covariation between residual intra‐individual variation in mass loss for first broods and other reproductive or life‐history traits. We therefore found no support for the idea that mass loss reflects "reproductive stress" in our system: there were no negative relationships between mass loss and either current or future reproduction and survival (local return rate). Our results are consistent with mass loss being an individually plastic trait, with individuals using mass loss to "level the playing field" and individually optimize reproductive effort and fitness within their specific ecological context and relative to their individual quality for a given breeding attempt.

The optimal clutch size revisited: separating individual quality from the parental survival costs of reproduction

Intraspecific Variation in Parental Care May Reflect Variation in Parental Quality

Mortality costs of parental care and sexual dimorphism in birds

Measuring Temporal Variation in Reproductive Output Reveals Optimal Resource Allocation to Reproduction in the Northern Grass Lizard, Takydromus Septentrionalis

Maternal investment mediates offspring life history variation with context-dependent fitness consequences

Effects of season length and uniparental care efficacy on the evolution of parental care

Phenotypic plasticity in mass loss during chick rearing in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)

Indirect costs of reproduction and the tradeoff between offspring size and number: a framework illustrated by fitness costs and benefits of ovarian fluid

Interacting phenotypic plasticities: Do male and female responses to the sociosexual environment interact to determine fitness?

Availability of mates and food influence the plasticity in strategies mediating life‐history tradeoffs in an insect

Maternal effect senescence and caloric restriction interact to affect fitness through changes in life history timing

Uncoupling clutch size, prolactin, and luteinizing hormone using experimental egg removal

The effects of reproduction on courtship, fertility and longevity within and between alternative male mating tactics of the horned beetle, Onthophagus binodis

Evolutionary implications of interspecific variation in a maternal effect: a meta-analysis of yolk testosterone response to competition

Trade-offs beget trade-offs: Causal analysis of mammalian population dynamics

Sex differences in life history drive evolutionary transitions among maternal, paternal, and bi-parental care

Controlling resource acquisition to reveal a life history trade‐off: egg mass and clutch size in an iteroparous seed predator, Prostephanus truncatus

Incorporating effects of age on energy dynamics predicts nonlinear maternal allocation patterns in iteroparous animals

Elevated reproduction does not affect telomere dynamics and oxidative stress

Faster reproductive rates trade off against offspring growth in wild chimpanzees

Fecundity, Offspring Longevity, and Assortative Mating: Parametric Tradeoffs in Sexual and Life History Strategy